Towards a Unified Framework of Work Commitment and Identification: Integrating Multiple Foci and Dimensions in Employee-Organization Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/s0fyxt29Keywords:
Work Commitment, Organizational Identification, Multiple Foci, Unified Framework, Employee-Organization Relationships, Organizational Behavior, Social Identity Theory, Social Exchange Theory, Multidimensional Model, Dynamic InteractionsAbstract
This article proposes a unified framework for understanding work commitment and identification, addressing the need for an integrated approach to these closely related yet distinct constructs in organizational behavior. Drawing on multiple theoretical perspectives, including Social Identity Theory, Self-Categorization Theory, and Social Exchange Theory, the framework synthesizes existing research on multiple foci of commitment and identification. It emphasizes the multidimensional, dynamic, and context-dependent nature of these psychological attachments in the workplace. The framework elucidates the complex interactions between different types of commitments and identifications, highlighting their potential for complementarity, conflict, or independence. By integrating these concepts, the article offers a more comprehensive model for explaining employee attitudes and behaviors in modern organizational settings. The practical implications of this unified approach are discussed across various domains of organizational management, including talent acquisition, performance management, leadership development, and organizational change. This integrative perspective not only advances theoretical understanding but also provides valuable insights for enhancing organizational effectiveness and employee well-being in increasingly complex work environments.
Downloads
References
[1] Avanzi, L., Albertini, S., Fraccaroli, F., Sarchielli, G., De Plato, G., & van Dick, R. (2018). Exploring identity dynamics from a combined social exchange and social identity perspective. International Public Management Journal, 21(4), 677-702.
[2] Avanzi, L., Fraccaroli, F., Sarchielli, G., Ullrich, J., & van Dick, R. (2014). Staying or leaving: A combined social identity and social exchange approach to predicting employee turnover intentions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 272-289.
[3] Blau, G., Paul, A., & John, N. S. (1993). On developing a general index of work commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 42(3), 298-314.
[4] Boros, S. (2008). Organizational identification: Theoretical and empirical analyses of competing conceptualizations. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 12(1), 1-28.
[5] Brown, A. D. (2017). Identity work and organizational identification. International journal of management reviews, 19(3), 296-317.
[6] Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of management studies, 44(6), 972-992.
[7] Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communications Monographs, 50(4), 342-362.
[8] Cohen, A. (1995). An examination of the relationships between work commitment and nonwork domains. Human Relations, 48(3), 239-263.
[9] Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. Handbook of social psychology, 61-88.
[10] Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: testing an integrative framework. Psychological bulletin, 131(2), 241.
[11] Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of management annals, 11(1), 479-516.
[12] Edwards, M. R. (2005). Organizational identification: A conceptual and operational review. International journal of management reviews, 7(4), 207-230.
[13] Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2007). Organizational identification: Development and testing of a conceptually grounded measure. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 16(1), 25-57.
[14] Elsbach, K. D. (1999). An expanded model of organizational identification. RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL. 21, 1999, 21, 163-200.
[15] Hackett, R. D., Lapierre, L. M., & Hausdorf, P. A. (2001). Understanding the links between work commitment constructs. Journal of vocational behavior, 58(3), 392-413.
[16] Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative science quarterly, 176-190.
[17] Kanste, O. (2011). Work engagement, work commitment and their association with well‐being in health care. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 25(4), 754-761.
[18] Lee, E. S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 141(5), 1049.
[19] Lee, S. M. (1971). An empirical analysis of organizational identification. Academy of Management journal, 14(2), 213-226.
[20] Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire. Management communication quarterly, 13(4), 626-658.
[21] Morrow, P. C., & McElroy, J. C. (1986). On assessing measures of work commitment. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 7(2), 139-145.
[22] Morrow, P. C., & McElroy, J. C. (1987). Work commitment and job satisfaction over three career stages. Journal of vocational behavior, 30(3), 330-346.
[23] Oludeyi, O. S. (2015). A review of literature on work environment and work commitment: implication for future research in citadels of learning. Journal of human resource management, 18(2), 32-46.
[24] Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of vocational behavior, 66(2), 358-384.
[25] Simbula, S., Margheritti, S., & Avanzi, L. (2023). Building work engagement in organizations: A longitudinal study combining social exchange and social identity theories. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 83.
[26] Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social psychology quarterly, 224-237.
[27] Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dick, R., & Tavares, S. (2007). Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 457-477.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







