Development Strategy of Carbon Finance in China Under the Low Carbon Economy Context

Yezhi Xia

doi:10.54097/szqb1a91

Authors

Yezhi Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/szqb1a91

Keywords:

Low Carbon Economy, Carbon Finance, Development Strategy

Abstract

As the concept of green development deepens, China actively promotes a low carbon economic development model, paying close attention to climate issue governance and carbon finance. Vigorously developing the carbon finance market and utilizing market mechanisms to optimize various resources, it provides industrial enterprises with carbon emission models that suit their own development. As the world's largest developing country, China should assume relevant responsibilities when facing global climate issues. Viewing the current development, countries worldwide have enhanced their focus on carbon trading markets and fully recognize the significant role of carbon finance in changing the future international financial landscape. From China's perspective, promoting the development of the carbon finance market and studying the current situation, issues, and strategies of carbon finance market development are crucial. This accelerates the construction of the carbon finance market in China, seeks the right to speak in the global carbon finance market, and thus, solidifies its standing in the international market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ni B, Huang W (2020) A model for evaluating the generalizability of military training methods based on an AISM model. Mil Oper Res Syst Eng 34(2):6.

[2] Ritz RA (2022) Global carbon price asymmetry. J Environ Econ Manag 114.

[3] Pan A, Zhang W, Shi X, & Dai L (2022) Climate policy and low-carbon innovation: evidence from low-carbon city pilots in China. Energy Econ 112.

[4] Yang Z, Lu M, Shao S, Fan M, Yang L (2023) Carbon regulation and economic growth: city-level evidence from China. Environ Impact Assess Rev 99.

[5] Mitra R, Das J (2023) A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(6):16036–16067.

[6] Sharma GD, Shahbaz M, Singh S, Chopra R, & Cifuentes-Faura J (2023) Investigating the nexus between green economy, sustainability, bitcoin and oil prices: Contextual evidence from the United States. Resour Policy 80.

[7] Su M, Woo S-H, Chen X, Park K (2023) Identifying critical success factors for the agri-food cold chain’s sustainable development: when the strategy system comes into play. Bus Strategy Environ 32(1):444–461.

[8] Tang K, Zhou Y, Liang X, Zhou D (2021) The effectiveness and heterogeneity of carbon emissions trading scheme in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(14):17306–17318.

[9] Thaler RH (2008) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Mark Sci 27(1):15–25.

[10] Luo Y, Li X, Qi X, & Zhao D (2021) The impact of emission trading schemes on firm competitiveness: evidence of the mediating effects of firm behaviors from the Guangdong ETS. J Environ Manag 290.

[11] Peng J, Tian C, Zhang W, Zhang S, Wang J (2020) An integrated multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable supplier selection under picture fuzzy environment. Technol Econ Dev Econ 26(3, SI):573–598.

[12] Phung QT, Vu HV, & Tran HP (2022) Do non-performing loans impact bank efficiency? Financ Res Lett 46(B).

[13] Qin Y, He J, Wei M, & Du X (2022) Challenges threatening agricultural sustainability in Central Asia: status and prospect. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(10).

[14] Ren D, Liu L, Gong X, Jiang P, Liu S, Yang Y, & Jin R (2022) Effect evaluation of ecological compensation for strategic mineral resources exploitation based on VIKOR-AISM model. Sustainability 14(23).