The Behavioral Economics of Green Consumption: How Moral Values and Material Limits Shape Food Choice in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/gjema403Keywords:
Green food consumption, Purchase intention, TPB, VBN theory, Green trust, Price sensitivity, Income moderation, Henan ProvinceAbstract
Green food, as a certified category of sustainable and safe agricultural products, has gained traction in China amidst growing environmental and health awareness. However, consumer adoption in Henan Province—despite strong governmental promotion—remains limited. This study investigates the factors influencing consumers’ green food purchase intentions by integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Value-Belief-Norm (VBN) theory into a unified analytical framework. Based on survey data from 1,047 respondents in Henan and regression-based modeling, the research examines the roles of environmental attitude, green knowledge, green trust, price sensitivity, external information exposure, and income level. Results indicate that environmental attitude is the most significant positive predictor of purchase intention (β ≈ 0.28, p < 0.01). While green knowledge and green trust also correlate positively with intention, their effects are largely mediated—especially through trust. Price sensitivity negatively affects intention, with the impact more pronounced among low-income consumers; income moderates this effect by mitigating cost sensitivity among wealthier groups. Moreover, exposure to policy and media does not directly enhance purchase intention, but significantly strengthens green trust, which then positively influences intention. These findings reveal a mediated-moderated pathway from cognition and values to behavior. Theoretically, this study enriches TPB and VBN integration by accounting for economic and institutional trust dimensions. Practically, it offers actionable insights—such as enhancing public education, reinforcing certification credibility, and implementing targeted subsidies—to bridge the “intention–behavior” gap in green food consumption.
Downloads
References
[1] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
[2] Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British journal of social psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
[3] Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
[4] Braulio-Gonzalo, M., & Bovea, M. D. (2020). Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106310.
[5] Chan, R. Y., & Lau, L. B. (2001). Explaining green purchasing behavior: A cross-cultural study on American and Chinese consumers. Journal of international consumer marketing, 14(2-3), 9-40.
[6] Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of business ethics, 114, 489-500.
[7] Cheng, L., Cui, H., Zhang, Z., Yang, M., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Study on consumers' motivation to buy green food based on meta-analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1405787.
[8] Choi, D., & Johnson, K. K. (2019). Influences of environmental and hedonic motivations on intention to purchase green products: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 145-155.
[9] Civero, G., Rusciano, V., Scarpato, D., & Simeone, M. (2021). Food: Not only safety, but also sustainability. the emerging trend of new social consumers. Sustainability, 13(23), 12967.
[10] de Sio, S., Zamagni, A., Casu, G., & Gremigni, P. (2022). Green trust as a mediator in the relationship between green advertising skepticism, environmental knowledge, and intention to buy green food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16757.
[11] Fan, L., Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., & Ma, Y. (2023). Urban–Rural Disparities in Knowledge, Use and Perceived Benefits of Nutrition Labels in China: Evidence from 10 Provinces. Nutrients, 15(5), 1171.
[12] Han, G., & Yan, S. (2019). Does food safety risk perception affect the public’s trust in their government? An empirical study on a national survey in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(11), 1874.
[13] Hua, K., & Pang, X. (2024). Investigation into the factors affecting the green consumption behavior of China rural residents in the context of dual carbon. Sustainability, 16(13), 5797.
[14] Muraguri, E. K., Jin, S., & Samake, A. (2020). Modeling the role of perceived green value and consumer innovativeness in green products’ consumption intention within the theory of planned behavior. Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability, 4(2), 94-116.
[15] Jan, I. U., Ji, S., & Yeo, C. (2019). Values and green product purchase behavior: The moderating effects of the role of government and media exposure. Sustainability, 11(23), 6642.
[16] Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2012). Product labelling in the market for organic food: Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for different organic certification logos. Food quality and preference, 25(1), 9-22.
[17] Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global environmental change, 23(5), 1028-1038.
[18] Bhutto, M. Y., & Rūtelionė, A. (2024). Analyzing organic food purchase intentions: eco-literacy and innovation resistance. British Food Journal, 126(4), 1633-1653.
[19] Li, J., & Lin, Q. (2023). Threshold effects of green technology application on sustainable grain production: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1107970.
[20] Liu, F., & Madni, G. R. (2024). Moderating role of policy incentive and perceived cost in relationship of environmental awareness and green consumption behavior. Plos one, 19(2), e0296632.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







