The Gig Economy and Labor Market Flexibility: Implications for Wage Determination

Authors

  • Hanzhang Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0jwdc938

Keywords:

Gig Economy, Labor Market Flexibility, Wage Determination, Platform Economy, Employment Relationship, Labor Policy

Abstract

The gig economy has grown rapidly globally, transforming employment patterns and labor market dynamics. This paper analyzes the multifaceted relationship between the gig economy, labor market flexibility, and wage determination using literature review, case studies, and econometric methods. It explores how the gig economy enhances labor market flexibility through diversified employment relationships and structural changes, while also examining how labor market flexibility facilitates gig economy development. The study identifies key wage determinants in the gig economy, including traditional factors (skills, labor supply-demand, competition) and new platform-specific elements (algorithms, reputation systems, task attributes). Findings highlight significant implications: workers face opportunity-instability trade-offs; firms need optimized cost-benefit and wage-setting strategies; policymakers must address labor protection and social security gaps. This research enriches labor market theory in emerging economic models and offers practical insights for stakeholders navigating the gig economy landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Farrell, S., & Greig, F. (2016). Paychecks, Paydays, and the Online Platform Economy. JPMorgan Chase Institute.

[2] Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital Labour and Development. Oxford University Press.

[3] Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). Alternative Work Arrangements in the US. NBER Working Paper 24585.

[4] Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithms at Work. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(3), 331-347.

[5] US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Contingent and Alternative Employment Summary.

[6] Wood, A., et al. (2019). Good Gig, Bad Gig. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 117-137.

[7] Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press.

[8] Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine Bias. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

[9] American Bar Association. (2015). Report on the Uniformity of Sentencing. American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section.

[10] Berger, R. (2017). Reducing Racial Disparities in Sentencing through AI. Journal of Law and Technology, 45(2), 157-182.

[11] Dressler, J., & Michaels, S. (2009). Understanding Criminal Law (6th ed.). LexisNexis.

[12] Kleinberg, J., Lakkaraju, H., Leskovec, J., Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2018). Human Decisions and Machine Predictions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 237-293. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx038

Downloads

Published

09-09-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, H. (2025). The Gig Economy and Labor Market Flexibility: Implications for Wage Determination. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 20(3), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.54097/0jwdc938