Exploring Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development in Pedagogy: A Critique of a Learning Event in the Business/Economics Classroom

Authors

  • Zhenghong Xue

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v9i3.10506

Keywords:

Pedagogy, Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), Secondary Teaching Practice, Business/ Economic Classroom.

Abstract

This academic journal article presents a critical examination of Lev Vygotsky's Social Constructivist Theory and its application in the Business/Economics classroom within a British educational context. Vygotsky's theory posits that the interaction between an individual's learning and social environment significantly shapes their intellectual development. This research highlights the educator's crucial role in understanding students' limitations in the learning context and providing necessary support and guidance to facilitate effective learning outcomes. Central to Vygotsky's theory is the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), representing the "learning gap" between a student's current knowledge and their potential. Emphasizing the concept of Scaffolding as a key strategy to bridge this gap, this study investigates how Scaffolding, though not explicitly mentioned by Vygotsky, aligns inherently with the ZPD theory, facilitating students' progression from their current proficiency level (Point A) to a more advanced stage (Point B).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chaiklin, S. (2003) 'The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky's Analysis of Learning and Instruction', in Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press. pp. 39-64.

Gillies, R. M. & Boyle, M. (2006) Ten Australian Elementary Teachers' Discourse and Reported Pedagogical Practices during Cooperative Learning. The Elementary school journal. [Online] 106 (5), 429-452.

Kirschner, P. A. et al. (2006) Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational psychologist. [Online] 41 (2), 75-86.

Kraatz, E. et al. (2020) Teacher Scaffolding of Social and Intellectual Collaboration in Small Groups: A Comparative Case Study. Frontiers in psychology. [Online] 11587058-587058.

Newman, S. & Latifi, A. (2021) Vygotsky, education, and teacher education. Journal of education for teaching‚ÄØ: JET. [Online] 47 (1), 4-17.

Sanders, D. & Welk, D. S. (2005) Strategies to Scaffold Student Learning: Applying Vygotsky ºs Zone of Proximal Development. Nurse educator. [Online] 30 (5), 203-207.

Webb, S. et al. (2019) Thirty‚ÄêFive Years of the Gradual Release of Responsibility: Scaffolding Toward Complex and Responsive Teaching. The Reading teacher. [Online] 73 (1), 75-83.

Schultz, S. K. (2020) Nature of Formative Assessment-Based Active Learning in the Interactive Planetarium. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

van de Pol, J. et al. (2014) Teacher Scaffolding in Small-Group Work: An Intervention Study. The Journal of the learning sciences. [Online] 23 (4), 600-650.

Wood, D. et al. (1976) THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. [Online] 17 (2), 89-100.

Carr, A. & Pike, A. (2012) Maternal scaffolding behaviour: Links with parenting style and maternal education. Developmental psychology. [Online] 48 (2), 543-551.

Eun, B. (2019) The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesising Vygotsky's theories. Educational philosophy and theory. [Online] 51 (1), 18-30.

Lichtman, K. & VanPatten, B. (2021) Was Krashen right? Forty years later. Foreign language annals. [Online] 54 (2), 283-305.

Rozenszajn, R. & Yarden, A. (2014) Expansion of Biology Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) During a Long-Term Professional Development Program. Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association). [Online] 44 (1), 189-213.

Downloads

Published

25 July 2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xue, Z. (2023). Exploring Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development in Pedagogy: A Critique of a Learning Event in the Business/Economics Classroom. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 9(3), 166-168. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v9i3.10506