How Policymakers Are Responding to An Ageing Workforce in Japan and South Korea

Authors

  • Jing Gui

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13529

Keywords:

Fertility, Socio-economic strategies, Demographic change, Labour force ageing, policy shifts, Japan, Korea, Literature review, Secondary data analysis, Policy formulation, Social consequences, Strengths, Weaknesses, Recommendations, Best Practices, Limitations, Future investigations.

Abstract

 The global decline in fertility has prompted countries to reassess their socio-economic strategies. Specifically, Japan and the Republic of Korea are at the forefront of demographic change, with the ageing of the labour force becoming a growing concern. This study delves into the fertility policies of both countries, aiming to understand the complexity of policy shifts between them. Using a combination of literature review and secondary data analysis, the study reveals the nuances of policy making in the two countries. A thorough exploration of the social consequences of these policies provides a holistic view of their real-world implications. The analyses reveal commendable strengths and apparent weaknesses in the strategies employed by Japan and South Korea. Based on this, the study presents viable recommendations for effective policy transfer, incorporating best practices from both countries. Finally, the study provides a succinct summary of its findings, highlighting the inherent limitations of the research conducted. It also highlights the need for future investigations in this area, laying the groundwork for a more comprehensive study of fertility policies and their long-term social impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Centre for Public Impact (2017). Tackling the Declining Birth Rate in Japan. [online] Centre For Public Impact (CPI). Available at: https://www.centreforpublicimpact.org/case-study/tackling-declining-birth-rate-japan.

Defourny, J. and Kuan, Y.-Y. (2011). Social enterprise in eastern Asia. Emerald Publishing Limited, p.Are there specific models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia?

Haub, C. (2010). Did South Korea’s Population Policy Work Too Well? [online] PRB. Available at: https://www.prb.org/resources/did-south-koreas-population-policy work-too-well/.

Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48(4), pp.706–723. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00279.

Ilmarinen, J.E. (2001). AGING WORKERS. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, [online] 58(8), pp.546–546. doi:10.1136/oem.58.8.546.

Jeong, K., Yoon, J., Cho, H.J., Kim, S. and Jang, J. (2022). The relationship between changes in the korean fertility rate and policies to encourage fertility. BMC Public Health, 22(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14722-4.

Klein, A. and Mosler, H. (2021). GLOBAL POLITICAL DEMOGRAPHY : the politics of population change. S.L.: Springer Nature.

Mensik, S., Grainger, R.J. and Chatterjee, S.R. (2011). Trends and Transitions in Japanese and Korean Management Approaches. [online] ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268328209_Trends_and_Transitions_in_Japanese_and_Korean_Management_Approaches.

Powell, M. and Kim, K. (2014). The ‘Chameleon’ Korean Welfare Regime. Social Policy & Administration, 48(6), pp.626–646. doi:10.1111/spol.12088.

Tanaka, T. (2019). Japanese Welfare State in Comparative Perspective: An Overview * Takuji Tanaka. Bulletin of Social Sciences, [online] 11. Available at: http://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/hermes/ir/re/30351/shakaikg0110200010.pdf.

UK Data Service. (2020). OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics, 1950-2019. [online] Available at: DOI:https://doi.org/10.5257/oecd/labour/2020.

Verlinden, N. (2018). Aging workforce challenges: Trends, Statistics and Impact. [online] AIHR. Available at: https://www.aihr.com/blog/aging-workforce challenges/#What

Downloads

Published

6 November 2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gui, J. (2023). How Policymakers Are Responding to An Ageing Workforce in Japan and South Korea. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11(2), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13529