Exploring the Tragic Aesthetics in Hamlet and the Differences with Traditional Chinese Aesthetic Views
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/cx2jvd29Keywords:
Hamlet; Traditional Chinese; Aesthetic Views.Abstract
Tragedy, as an important form of human art, transcends time and space with its profound emotions and noble spiritual content, becoming a carrier of cultural resonance around the world. In different cultural backgrounds, the aesthetics of tragedy presents a variety of styles. These differences are reflected not only in aesthetic orientation but also in expressive techniques and value pursuits. Hamlet, as a distinguished representative of Western tragedy, constructs a unique and magnificent tragic tableau through its deep psychological analysis, complex character development, and intense conflict. The complexity and contradiction of human nature are vividly displayed in this work. In contrast, traditional Chinese aesthetic concepts place more emphasis on harmony, balance, and inner beauty. This aesthetic orientation emphasizes the moderation of emotions and moral education, pursuing a restrained and implicit beauty. In traditional Chinese tragedies, characters are often more reserved and implicit, with more controlled and moderate emotional expression. Comparing the tragic aesthetics in Hamlet with traditional Chinese aesthetic views reveals significant differences in several aspects. This comparison helps us understand more deeply the art of tragedy under different cultural backgrounds, recognize the complexity and diversity of human nature, and profoundly appreciate the fragility and preciousness of life.
Downloads
References
Stenner P., Greco M. On “The Magic Mountain”: The novel as liminal affective technology [J]. International Political Anthropology, 2018, 11(1), 43–60.
Stenner P., Zittoun T. On taking a leap of faith: Art, imagination and liminal experiences[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 2020, 40(4), 240–263.
Valsiner J. The place for synthesis Vygotsky’s analysis of affective generalization[J]. History of the Human Sciences, 2015, 28(2), 93–102.
Yaroshevskii M. G. The psychology of creativity and creativity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 1996, 25(3), 22–44.
Zittoun T. Symbolic resources and imagination in the dynamics of life. In Rosa A., Valsiner J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology(2nd ed., 2018, pp. 178–204). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







