A Comparative Study of Kinship Appellations Between China and South Korea

Authors

  • Qiuju Ling

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/1by01t91

Keywords:

Chinese and Korean kinship appellations; Language and culture; Similarities and differences.

Abstract

Appellation is an indispensable part of People's Daily communication, "appellation" is people according to relatives or other mutual relations and identity, occupation, etc. As a part of appellation, kinship appellation occupies an important position in the study of language and culture, and kinship appellation, as a basic vocabulary, has formed a strict system in each national language. It is relatively stable and reflects a nation's cultural tradition, life style, national psychology and other characteristics. Through the research and analysis of kinship terms in China and South Korea, this paper explores the similarities and differences between the two peoples' language and culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pu Lianyu.Korean Nationality Kinship System and "Inch Counting Method"[J]. Heilongjiang Nationality Series, 1999(01): 75-78.DOI:10.16415/j.cnki.23-1021/c.1999.01.021.

Nie Ying, Yang Qizhen, Nie Linghong.A comparative study of Chinese and Korean kinship predicates from a cross-cultural perspective[J]. Journal of Guangxi University of Education, 2021 (04): 48-51.

Park Ju Yeon. A comparative study on the conversion of predicates of Han and Han kinship [D]. East China Normal University, 2016.

Li Xianglin. A comparative study on the predicates of Chinese and Korean kinship [D]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University,2012.

Jin Shouxuan. A comparative study on modern kinship predicates in Han and Han countries[D]. Shandong University, 2011.

Zhao Zhongshu. Research on modern kinship predicates in China and Korea [D]. Shandong University,2008.

Downloads

Published

24 April 2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ling, Q. (2024). A Comparative Study of Kinship Appellations Between China and South Korea. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 13(3), 260-262. https://doi.org/10.54097/1by01t91