A Corpus-based Investigation on the English Majors’ Use of Cohesive Devices in Argumentative Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/az0qby63Keywords:
Cohesion Indices, Corpus-based, EFL LearnersAbstract
Many factors affect the quality of English writing. Among them, the cohesion of discourse has been an important topic in writing research. This study aims to investigate the use of local, global, and text cohesion features in Chinese English majors’ argumentative writing and how EFL learners of higher proficiency (Grade 4) develop their written discourse competence as compared with the lower proficiency (Grade 1). The Written English Corpus of Chinese Learners (WECCL 2.0) was adopted as the main corpus. The research finds that connectives and lexical overlaps are more frequently used in English writing, and a tiny minority of cohesive devices showed growth across the two grade levels. The findings provide important insights for researchers and teachers on second language acquisition, English writing development and English writing teaching.
Downloads
References
Berninger, V. W., Fuller, F., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A process model of writing development across the life span. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 193–218.
Chiang, S. Y. (1999). Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples: The case of French as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 219–232.
Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in ESL students’ writing. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 17, 301–316.
Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18,119–135.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 984–989). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text coherence and judgments of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1236–1241). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1-16.
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S. (2010). Predicting lexical profificiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing, 28, 561–580.
Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English second language speakers. Language Learning, 60, 573–605.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193-202.
Green, C. F., Christopher, E. R. & Jacquelyn, L. (2000). The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 99–113.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jafarpur, A. (1991). Cohesiveness as a basis for evaluating compositions. System, 19, 459–465.
Johnson, D. P. (1992). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and English. RELC Journal, 23, 1–17.
Kang, J. Y. (2005). Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 259–279.
Liu, M. & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33, 623–636.
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 2(1–3), 113–140.
Myhill, D. A. (2008). Towards a linguistic model of sentence development in writing. Language and Education, 22, 271–288.
Todd, R. W., Khongput, S. & Darasawang, P. (2007). Coherence, cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays. Assessing Writing, 12, 10–25.
Xu, Y. (2003). Comparative Analysis of Cohesion Patterns and Errors in English Composition. Theory and Practice of Foreign Language Teaching (3), 54-60.
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31–48.
Zeng, S. (2014). Analysis of Cohesion and Errors in English Writing among Non English Majoring College Students. Xiangtan University.
Zhang, M. (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC Journal, 31, 61–95.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
