The Influence of Chinese University Students' English Grammar Proficiency on Self-Repair in Oral Speech

Authors

  • Shiyi Shao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fevprt07

Keywords:

Self-repairs, Second-language Speech Production, Grammar Proficiency

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether Chinese university students' English grammar proficiency affects the frequency and types of self-repair. The experiment was conducted in two steps: a grammar proficiency test followed by an oral task. Data were analyzed using T-tests and SPSS. The results indicate no significant differences in the frequency and types of self-repair between high and low grammar proficiency groups. The distribution characteristics of self-repair align with previous research, but the high grammar proficiency group exhibited a higher frequency of grammatical repairs. These findings suggest that although individuals may exhibit a high level of grammatical knowledge, their oral proficiency may not necessarily correspond to the same level. Grammar proficiency is a component of overall English proficiency, but it does not represent the entirety of language ability. The emphasis on written expression in Chinese education provides an explanation for the study's results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Baker, C., & Prys Jones, S. (1998). Encyclopedia of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

[2] Branigan, H., Lickley, R., & McKelvie, D. (1999). Non-linguistic influences on rates of disfluency in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of the ICPhS (pp. 387–390). San Francisco: ICPhS.

[3] Cai, J. T., & Chen, J. Y. (2018). Self-repairs in Chinese undergraduates’ oral English production and their psycholinguistic mechanism. Foreign Language Education in China, 1, 43-53, 92.

[4] De Jong, N., & Vercellotti, M. L. (2016). Similar prompts may not be similar in the performance they elicit: Examining fluency, complexity, accuracy, and lexis in narratives from five picture prompts. Language Teaching Research, 20, 387–404.

[5] Fox, B. A., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 185–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6] Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303-342.

[7] Kovač, M. M., & Milatović, B. (2012). Analysis of repair distribution, error correction rates and repair successfulness in L2. Studia Linguistica, 67(2), 225-255.

[8] Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41-104.

[9] Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.

[10] Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.

[11] Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780203 851357.

[12] Sun, T. (2014). The effects of different English proficiency levels and foreign language classroom anxiety on the self-repair of university students (Master's thesis, Chongqing University). Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/ article/ abstract?v=vAdbs87d_Cl-HkC8BKs0RMyJY9X3Z8Fb9__O9MctNXw-F2fcWXtpfulU0PDV41CuRDAmeseiLrYQl_hTmT_Sxwoj8X3bOgqDHfueq4AzOaHGuIG-PhUlOQjSnOUUCzCNy2DI-vOjsI2kSJaG6c8ehVcMVy4VpJIZ

[13] Van Hest, E. (1996). Self-repair as a measure of language proficiency. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Language Testing Colloquium, Tampere, Finland.

[14] Van Hest, E. (2000). Analyzing self-repair: An alternative way of language assessment. In Learner-directed assessment in ESL (pp. 75-88).

[15] Wu, Z. (2021). The effects of foreign language communication anxiety and risk-taking on the Chinese English learners' self-repair behavior in their oral English (Master's thesis, Lanzhou Jiaotong University). Retrieved from https://link.cnki.net/doi/ 10.27205/d.cnki.gltec.2021.000897.

[16] Yang, L. Q. (2002). The effect of English proficiency on self-repair behavior of EFL learners. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 4, 74-76. https://doi.org/10.16482/j.sdwy37-1026. 2002.04.028.

Downloads

Published

28 August 2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shao, S. (2024). The Influence of Chinese University Students’ English Grammar Proficiency on Self-Repair in Oral Speech. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 16(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.54097/fevprt07