University Administrator’s Leadership Styles Affecting Instructors’ Job Satisfaction in a Normal University in Jiangxi Province, China

Authors

  • Anqi Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/a9c69651

Keywords:

University Leadership, Instructors' Job Satisfaction, Autocratic Leadership, Democratic Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Laissez-Faire Leadership

Abstract

This study aims to explore how university leaders' leadership styles influence instructors' job satisfaction. Effective university leadership is crucial to the success of educational institutions, as leaders directly impact instructors' satisfaction by shaping the work environment and decision-making processes. The study examines various types of leadership styles, including autocratic, democratic, transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership, and analyzes their different impacts on job satisfaction. The findings suggest that democratic and transformational leadership styles generally contribute to higher levels of job satisfaction among instructors, while autocratic and laissez-faire leadership styles may lead to lower satisfaction. These insights provide valuable guidance for university leaders in enhancing instructors' job satisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Adair, J. E. (2019). Develop Your Leadership Skills. London: Kogan Page Publishers.W.-K. Chen, Linear Networks and Systems (Book style). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1993, pp. 123–135.

[2] Ali, T. (2018). Raising instructors’ voices: An in-depth qualitative inquiry into instructors’ working conditions and professional development needs in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province of Pakistan. Teaching and Instructor Education, 22, 78–104.

[3] Baig, S. A., Iqbal, S., Abrar, M., Baig, I. A., Amjad, F., et al. (2021). Impact of leadership styles on employees’ performance with moderating role of positive psychological capital. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 32, 1085–1105.

[4] Bass, B. M., and Steidlmeier, P. (2021). Ethics, Character, and Authentic Transformational Leadership Behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(issue), 181–217.

[5] Blatt, D. A. (2018). A Study to Determine the Relationship between the Leadership Styles of Career Technical Directors and University Climate as Assessed by Instructors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(12).

[6] Bogler, R. (2023). The Influence of Leadership Style on Instructor Job Satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–683.

[7] Bush, T., Bell, L., and Middlewood, D. (2022). Introduction: New Directions in Educational Leadership. Principles of Educational Leadership and Management, 3–12.

[8] Chen, Y. G., Cheng, J. N., & Sato, M. (2023). Effects of university administrators’ leadership behaviors: A comparison between Taiwan and Japan. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 145–173.

[9] Damai, S., Efendi, R., & Sulaiman. (2019). The Instructor Achievement Motivation as an Intervening Variable in the Relationship between Instructor’s Professionalism, Administrator’s Leadership, and Instructor’s Performance of State High University in Banjarmasin City. Journal of K6, Education, and Management (J-K6EM), 2(1), 33-35.

[10] Dembelé , M., and Rogers, F. H. (2019). "More and Better Instructors: Making the Slogan a Reality," in More and Better Instructors for Quality Education for All: Identity and Motivation, Systems, and Support. Editors J. Kirk, M. Dembelé, and S. Baxter, 174–180.

[11] Ekosiswoyo, R. (2022). Administrator Leadership Effective Keys to Achieving Educational Quality. Journal of Educational Science, 14(2), 76-82.

[12] Eyal, O., and Roth, G. (2023). Administrators’ Leadership and Instructors’ Motivation. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275.

[13] Feng, B. (2019). A Study of Instructor Job Satisfaction and Factors that Influence It. Chinese Education and Society, 40, 5.

[14] Fuller, J. B., Patterson, C. E. P., Hester, K., and Stringer, D. Y. (2018). A Quantitative Review of Research on Charismatic Leadership. Psychological Reports, 78(1), 271–287.

[15] Ghazi, S. E. (2018). Job Satisfaction of Head Instructors for Selected Twenty Dimensions of Job. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 652-665.

[16] Gorton, R., Alston, J., & Snowden, P. (2018). University leadership and administration: Important concepts, case studies and simulations. Open University Press. The McGraw-Hill.

[17] Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 46, 5–24.

[18] Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2023). Collaborative leadership and university improvement: Understanding the impact on university capacity and student learning. In International Handbook of Leadership for Learning (pp. 469–485).

[19] Hu, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Administrator leadership styles and their impact on instructor job satisfaction: A comparative analysis. Chinese Journal of Educational Administration, 45(3), 325-342.

[20] Ibrahim, M. S., Ghavifekr, S., Ling, S., Siraj, S., & Azeez, M. I. K. (2020). Can transformational leadership influence instructors’ commitment towards organizational, teaching profession, and students' learning? A quantitative analysis. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., 15, 177-190.

[21] Kanat-Maymon, Y., Elimelech, M., and Roth, G. (2020). Work Motivations as Antecedents and Outcomes of Leadership: Integrating Self-Determination Theory and the Full Range Leadership Theory. European Management Journal, 38(4), 555–564.

[22] Lambersky, J. (2022). Understanding the human side of university leadership: Administrators’ impact on instructors’ morale, self-efficacy, stress, and commitment. Leadership and Policy in Universities, 15, 379–405.

[23] Li, Q., & Wang, H. (2018). Exploring the dimensions of administrator leadership styles in K-12 universitys. Chinese Educational Leadership Quarterly, 44(1), 67-84.

[24] Mumford, M. D. (2018). Pathways to Outstanding Leadership: A Comparative Analysis of Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[25] Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. New York: Sage publications.

[26] Robbins, S. P. (2019). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). San Diego: Prentice Hall.

[27] Sawati, M. J., Anwar, S., and Majoka, M. I. (2019). Do qualification, Experience and Age Matter for Administrators’ Leadership Styles?. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(7), 403–413.

[28] Tajasom, A., and Ahmad, Z. A. (2023). Administrators’ Leadership Style and University Climate: Instructors’ Perspectives from Malaysia. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services.

[29] Terosky, A. L. (2022). Enacting instructional leadership: perspectives and actions of public K-12 administrators. University Leadership and Management, 36, 311–332.

[30] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2018). International Task Force on Instructors for Education 2030: Strategic Plan 2018–2021.

[31] Wardhani, E. W., & Soetomo, W. E. (2023). Effect of Administrator Leadership and Work Motivation on Instructor Performance with Instructor Job Satisfaction as Mediation Variables in SMA Negeri 11 Semarang. Journal of Vision Management, 2(2), 139-155.

[32] Younas, A., Wang, D., Javed, B., & Haque, A. U. (2022). Inclusive leadership and voice behavior: the role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication.

[33] Zein, A. K. A., & Hadijah, H. S. (2018). Effect of Organizational Commitment and Work Motivation on Instructor Performance in Pasundan 1 Vocational High University Cimahi. Journal of Office Management Education, 2(1), 62-68.

[34] Zidle, M. (2018). What is Job Satisfaction. Online Integrated Library for Personal, Professional and Organizational Development.

Downloads

Published

28 August 2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Liu, A. (2024). University Administrator’s Leadership Styles Affecting Instructors’ Job Satisfaction in a Normal University in Jiangxi Province, China. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 16(1), 161-164. https://doi.org/10.54097/a9c69651