Development of an AI Moral Education Assessment Tool: Identifying and Validating Key Factors through Factor Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/z5zpw272Keywords:
Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Analysis, Item Development, Scale Development Scale EvaluationAbstract
This research identified factors contributing to the development of an effective moral education evaluation tool in the context of Artificial Intelligence by using Factor Analysis By exploring these factors , the study seeks to enhance the quality of moral education and provide valuable insights for education administrators.Three hundred respondents who were actively involved in moral education programs at Yichun University in China were selected as participants in this study.Based on the factor analysis, there are five (5) factors that were extracted in the development of moral education and these are: training and support, ethical principles and guidelines, educational innovation, educational technological advancement, and acceptability and adaptability.
Downloads
References
[1] Guo Yiqian,(2016). A Comparative study on moral education curriculum in Middle schools between China and Britain [D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Normal University.
[2] Gao Jie.(2021), Realistic difficulties and breakthrough Path of moral education evaluation in primary and secondary schools in the New era [J]. New Curriculum Guidance,No.533(28):63-65
[3] Gao Jie.(2021), Realistic difficulties and breakthrough Path of moral education evaluation in primary and secondary schools in the New era [J]. New Curriculum Guidance,No.533(28):63-65.
[4] Luo Tian.(2019),The Qualitative Evaluation of moral Education Evaluation Model in Chinese universities [J]. Journal of Science and Education (Zhong xian),(08):39-40.
[5] Si Linbo, Ma Peixi & Qiao Huayun.(2023). The development process, hot areas and changing characteristics of domestic educational evaluation research in the past 30 years. Modern Educational Management (11),63-73.doi:10.16697/j.1674-5485.2023.11.006.
[6] Abdel-Rahman, M. (2023). Advanced cybersecurity measures in IT service operations and their crucial role in safeguarding enterprise data in a connected world. Eigenpub Review of Science and Technology, 7(1), 138-158.
[7] Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140527.
[8] Ayeni, O. O., Al Hamad, N. M., Chisom, O. N., Osawaru, B., & Adewusi, O. E. (2024). AI in education: A review of personalized learning and educational technology. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2), 261-271.
[9] Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068.
[10] Bogina, V., Hartman, A., Kuflik, T., & Shulner-Tal, A. (2022). Educating software and AI stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-26.
[11] Casas-Roma, J., Conesa, J., & Caballé, S. (2021, July). Education, ethical dilemmas and AI: from ethical design to artificial morality. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 167-182). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[12] Chavanayarn, S. (2023). Navigating Ethical Complexities Through Epistemological Analysis of ChatGPT. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 43(3-4), 105-114.
[13] CHENG Cong,CHEN Feng,YANG duo.(2023). Reverse shaping of digital technology:On the tension of digital technology[J]. Research in Science,2023,41(02):202-211.
[14] Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568.
[15] Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., & Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens:Preparing America's undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility.
[16] Community wide -FrameworkEthics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework | International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (springer.com)
[17] David L. Poole and Alan K. Mackworth,(2023)."Artificial Intelligence: Foundations of Computational Agents" . Cambridge University Press
[18] Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 12.
[19] Essa, S. G., Celik, T., & Human-Hendricks, N. E. (2023). Personalized adaptive learning technologies based on machine learning techniques to identify learning styles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 11, 48392-48409.
[20] F. Clark Power,(2007)"Moral Education: A Handbook" - Bruce S. Cooper ;Praeger Publishing.
[21] Ferrara, E. (2023). Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Sci, 6(1), 3.
[22] Floridi,L.,&Cowls,J.(2019).A Unified Framework of Five Principles for A Iin Society.Harvard Data Science Review,1(1).
[23] Floridi,L.,&Cowls,J.(2019).A Unified Framework of Five Principles for A Iin Society.Harvard Data Science Review,1(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
