Reform and Practice of Teaching Models for Financial Experiment Courses from the Perspective of Industry-University-Research Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/t4d22v93Keywords:
Industry-University-Research Integration, Financial Experiment Courses, Teaching Model ReformAbstract
Under the background of industry-university-research integration, the teaching model of financial experiment courses in universities needs innovation and optimization to cultivate high-quality, multidisciplinary talents capable of meeting the demands of the modern financial industry. This study, adopting the perspective of industry-university-research integration, deeply analyzes the issues in teaching objectives, content design, teaching methods, and evaluation mechanisms of financial experiment courses. It proposes measures such as strengthening university-enterprise cooperation, introducing financial technology tools, optimizing teaching content, improving teachers' practical experience, and reforming assessment methods to construct a practice-oriented teaching model. Using a case study of financial experiment course reform in a university, the research explores specific implementation paths to incorporate real financial data, industry cases, simulated trading platforms, and innovative projects into teaching. It emphasizes the comprehensive development of students' practical abilities, innovative thinking, and overall qualities. The results show that the reform of the teaching model through deep integration of industry, academia, and research significantly enhances students' financial practice skills and innovation awareness while effectively bridging the gap between academic education and industry needs. This provides theoretical and practical support for the reform of experimental courses in financial disciplines.
Downloads
References
[1] Shao Yunfei, Zeng Yong, Wang Lamei. Exploration of a Collaborative Innovation Talent Training Model from the Perspective of University-Industry Cooperation-A Case Study of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2017, 19(1): 15-19.
[2] Ji Shangzhou, Ying Shangjun, Yang Weikun, et al. Innovation of Asset Evaluation Teaching Model Based on Deep Collaboration Between Industry, University, and Research [J]. Asset Evaluation, 2020 (12): 49.
[3] Wang Y, Wan S, Li W. Exploration on Experimental Economics and the Education Reform of "New Finance and Economics" [C]//2020 International Symposium on Advances in Informatics, Electronics and Education (ISAIEE). IEEE, 2020: 43-46.
[4] Cong Haibin, Shao Jinling, Zou Deling. Exploration and Practice of the "Economics + " Interdisciplinary Talent Training Model in the Context of the New Business Disciplines [J]. Advances in Education, 2022, 12: 3543.
[5] Zhang W. Research on the Reform of Engineering Finance Management Course from the Perspective of Supply-Side Reform [C]//2019 5th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2019). Atlantis Press, 2019: 185-188.
[6] Li J, Liu H. Research on Curriculum Reform of Microelectronics Technology Experiment in Universities Under the Background of Industry and Education Integration [J]. The Educational Review, USA, 2023, 7(11): 1748-1752.
[7] Alex S W. Research on Curriculum Reform and Laboratory Construction through Academia-Industry Integration in Quantitative Investment [J]. The Educational Review, USA, 2023, 7(5): 613-619.
[8] Jonassen D H. Instructional Design as Design Problem Solving: An Iterative Process [J]. Educational Technology, 2008: 21-26.
[9] Bennett R E. The Changing Nature of Educational Assessment [J]. Review of Research in Education, 2015, 39(1): 370-407.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
