Study on the Heritage and Development of the Forbidden City's Ceramic Culture through the Lens of Intercultural Communication

Authors

  • Shuang Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ejwy2h50

Keywords:

Intercultural Communication, Ceramic Culture, Cultural Heritage

Abstract

This paper conducts an in-depth study on the inheritance and development of the Forbidden City's ceramic culture from the perspective of cross-cultural communication. By combing through the historical origins, artistic characteristics, and cultural connotations of the Forbidden City's ceramics, this paper reveals its significant position in the transmission of Chinese culture. Furthermore, the article analyzes how the Forbidden City's ceramic culture transcends geographical and cultural boundaries to achieve international dissemination and exchange under the backdrop of globalization. Based on this, the paper discusses the opportunities and challenges faced by the Forbidden City's ceramic culture in its inheritance and development process and proposes corresponding strategies and suggestions. The research aims to promote the international dissemination of the Forbidden City's ceramic culture, to drive its innovation and development in contemporary society, and to provide reference for the protection and transmission of world cultural heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hall, E. T. (1991). The Silent Language. (L. Jianrong, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House. (Original work published 1959).

[2] Hall, E. T. (2010). Beyond Culture. (D. K. He, Trans.). Beijing: Peking University Press. (Original work published 1976).

[3] Hofstede, G. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. (Original work published 1991).

[4] Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

[5] Bond, M. H. (1987). The Chinese Culture Connection: Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(346), 72-75.

[6] Pietsch, U., & Wu, P. (2005). Porcelain-A mirror of German and European acceptance of Chinese culture. Chinese Historical Objects, (004), 22-25.

[7] Reffner, R. (2015). The Story of Blue and White Porcelain. (M. X. Zheng, Trans.). Hainan: Hainan Publishing House.

[8] Li, L., Xu, X. X., & Zhu, Z. Y. (2021). An exploration of intercultural communication based on difference. Public Relations World, (20), 196-198.

[9] Zhou, S. Y. (2021). Textual strategies of Chinese commercial blockbusters in intercultural communication in recent years. Art Exploration, 35(04), 117-122.

[10] Zhang, M., & Wu, J. L. (2020). How to tell Chinese stories well from the perspective of intercultural communication: Taking Li Ziqi's food short videos as an example. TV Research, (12), 70-73.

[11] Li, S. J., & Li, X. H. (2014). National identity and cultural identity in the global perspective: From the perspective of ceramic cultural exchange. China Ceramics, (10), 45-48.

[12] Shao, Y. (2022). Research on the symbolic representation and intercultural communication of traditional ceramic elements. China Ceramics, 58(05), 86-92. doi:10.16521/j.cnki.issn.1001-9642.2022.05.012.

[13] Sun, Y. C. (2015). Intercultural Communication Studies. Beijing: Peking University Press. (Original work published 2015).

[14] Hall, S., & Xiao, S. (2018). Encoding and decoding in television discourse. Shanghai Culture, (02), 33-45, 106, 125-126.

Downloads

Published

27 December 2024

Issue

Section

Articles