The Philological Origins of the Concepts of "Zhong" and "He"

Authors

  • Maoxiao Min
  • Guatpeng Ngoi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/tgdk7a89

Keywords:

Bronze Inscriptions, Evolution of Characters, He(和), Oracle Bone Script, Zhong(中), Zhong-He Philosophy

Abstract

From the perspectives of philology and intellectual history, this paper explores the evolution of the concepts of "Zhong" (中) and "He" (和) and their roles in shaping the philosophy of "Zhong-He" (Harmony and Moderation). By analyzing the development of glyphs and semantic meanings in oracle bone script and bronze inscriptions, it reveals how "Zhong" symbolizes spatial centrality and the principle of moderation, while "He" extends its significance to harmony in sound and social relationships. The article further elaborates on the complementary nature of the early semantics of "Zhong" and "He" and the process of their conceptual integration, especially as manifested in Confucian classics. By tracing the transformation of "Zhong" and "He" from independent concepts to a systematic philosophical doctrine, the study argues that the philosophy of "Zhong-He" represents a synthesis of static order and dynamic coordination, serving as a fundamental theoretical pillar in Chinese civilization across social, philosophical, and ethical dimensions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Z. G. Zhao, “History of Chinese Thought,” in History of Chinese Thought, vol. 1, Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2001, pp. 20.

[2] M. R. Guo, “Collection of Oracle Bone Inscriptions,” in Collection of Oracle Bone Inscriptions, vols. 1–13, Hangzhou: Zhejiang People’s Fine Arts Publishing House, 1999.

[3] L. Tang, “Records of Yin Xu Characters,” in Records of Yin Xu Characters, Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2016, pp. 82–83.

[4] X. Q. Qiu, “On the ‘Shezhong’ in the Chapter Pan Geng,” in Interpretation of Excavated Documents and Transmitted Classics, 2017.

[5] D. K. Huang, “The Key to Chinese Civilization: Interpretation and Exploration of Chinese Characters,” in The Key to Chinese Civilization, Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 2011.

[6] Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, “Collected Bronze Inscriptions of the Yin and Zhou Dynasties,” in Collected Bronze Inscriptions of the Yin and Zhou Dynasties, Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2007.

[7] C. F. Wang, “Research on Clan Emblems in Bronze Inscriptions of the Shang Dynasty,” in Research on Clan Emblems in Bronze Inscriptions of the Shang Dynasty, Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2015.

[8] P. A. Zhao, “Interpretation of Bronze Inscriptions and the Exploration of Civilization,” in Interpretation of Bronze Inscriptions and the Exploration of Civilization, Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, 2011.

[9] S. G. Yu, “On the Term ‘China,’” in Collected Essays on Chinese Studies, Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1981.

[10] S. G. Yu, “Oracle Bone Characters: An Analytical Forest,” in Oracle Bone Characters: An Analytical Forest, vol. 1, Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1996, pp. 736.

[11] L. Wang, “Dictionary of Cognate Words,” in Dictionary of Cognate Words, Beijing: Commercial Press, 1982, pp. 414.

[12] Z. S. Xu, “Dictionary of Oracle Bone Characters,” in Dictionary of Oracle Bone Characters, Chengdu: Sichuan Publishing Group, 2014, pp. 199.

[13] Z. M. Kou, “The Formation of Chinese Characters and Interpretation of Classical Texts,” Journal of Hechi University, vol. 12, no. 6, Dec. 2022.

[14] Jingmen City Museum, “Guodian Chu Tomb Bamboo Slips,” in Guodian Chu Tomb Bamboo Slips, Beijing: Cultural Relics Publishing House, 1998.

[15] X. Q. Li, “Warring States Bamboo Slips Collected by Tsinghua University (Vol. 1),” in Warring States Bamboo Slips Collected by Tsinghua University, Shanghai: Zhongxi Book Company, 2010.

Downloads

Published

13 February 2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Min, M., & Guatpeng Ngoi. (2025). The Philological Origins of the Concepts of "Zhong" and "He". International Journal of Education and Humanities, 18(2), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.54097/tgdk7a89