Construction and Validation of A Self-Assessment Scale of Police English Proficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/sz8n4g71Keywords:
English for Specific Purposes, Police English Proficiency, China’s Standards of English Language AbilityAbstract
To address the urgent need for international police exchange, cooperation, and handling foreign-related cases, it is crucial to train police officers who have strong public security skills and high-level English communication and enforcement abilities. Police English is an interdisciplinary in applied linguistics that combines public security, law, and psychology within an English context. Given the growth of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teaching in Chinese universities, developing a standardized approach to police English teaching is necessary. Recently, some public security academies have introduced police English courses, tailoring their teaching methods and materials to their specific needs. Despite these efforts, there is still no unified standard for police English proficiency in China. This lack of standardization hinders the improvement of teaching quality and fails to provide a consistent benchmark for all public security colleges.m. By referencing the language proficiency scales of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE), we can establish clear components and quantitative standards for Police English Proficiency(PEP). This will enable the creation of a unified assessment standard for police English skills, aligning teaching more closely with practical law enforcement needs.
Downloads
References
[1] Akıncıoğlu, M. (2023). Rethinking of EMI in higher education: a critical view on its scope, definition and quality. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–16.
[2] Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Bacon‐Shone, J. (2017). English-medium instruction in Singapore higher education: policy, realities and challenges. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 913–930.
[3] David L. (2022) .English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education. ISSN: 2631-4407
[4] Guo, L., He, Y., & Wang, S. (2022). An evaluation of English-medium instruction in higher education: influencing factors and effects. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–18.
[5] Park, S., Kim, S. Y., Lee, H., & Kim, E. G. (2022). Professional development for English-medium instruction professors at Korean universities. System, 109, 102862.
[6] Si, J. (2023). Lost in the EMI trend: Language-Related Issues emerging from EMI practice. SAGE Open, 13(3).
[7] Yan, W., Yu, S., & Shao, Y. (2017). The experiences of Chinese mainland students with English-medium instruction in a Macau University. Educational Studies, 44(3), 357–360.
[8] Yan, W., & Yu, S. (2023). Learning through EMI (English-medium instruction) in a Macau university: students’ perspectives and content and language outcomes. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–17.
[9] Yu, S., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., & Bo, W. (2020). Coping with EMI (English as a medium of instruction): Mainland China students’ strategies at a university in Macau. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 462–472.
[10] Yuan, R., Qiu, X., Wang, C., & Zhang, T. (2023). Students’ attitudes toward language learning and use in English-medium instruction (EMI) environments: a mixed methods study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







