Comparative Study of the Culture, Attire, and Ritual Implements of Mongolian Shamanism and Tibetan Bon Religion

Authors

  • Chaobo Yang
  • M. Molomjamts
  • D. Ulziibayar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fw8xdx97

Keywords:

Mongolian Shamanism, Tibetan Bon, Ritual Attire, Ceremonial Implements, Symbolism, Cultural Comparison

Abstract

This study is dedicated to a comparative analysis of the differences between the ritual implements and attire used in Mongolian shamanism and those found in Tibetan Bon religious temples. By conducting an in-depth investigation into the ceremonial tools and clothing of these two cultural traditions, the research aims to uncover the symbolic meanings and cultural values embedded in them. Drawing on multidisciplinary documentary sources, the study seeks to produce comparative results that will enhance our understanding of both the shared and distinct features of these religious cultures. Although these two traditions are rooted in different regions, they share some common elements in their belief systems. Religious practice holds a significant place in Mongolian culture, just as similar religious expressions exist within the Tibetan Bon tradition. While Tibet is widely known for its Buddhist heritage, Mongolian society has also been heavily influenced by Buddhism-especially in the western regions-through sustained cultural exchange. It could be argued that both religious systems have evolved from earlier, more primal forms of belief. The cultures of both peoples are reflected in their daily lives, traditional arts, intangible heritage, oral traditions, and nature-based spirituality. These shared aspects offer insight into the national identity, artistic expression, and spiritual practices of both Mongolian and Tibetan societies. Comparing the ritual garments and tools of Mongolian and Tibetan belief systems holds considerable academic and cultural value. Such analysis contributes to a better understanding of the origins, transformations, and distinctive expressions of nature-based spiritual traditions. Efforts to preserve and revitalize these belief systems-along with studies of the symbolic meanings of ritual items and clothing-can help both Mongolian and Tibetan peoples better understand and appreciate their cultural identities. Comparative research of this kind has the potential to illuminate the spiritual frameworks of shamanic and Buddhist temples, while also highlighting key distinctions. The artistic decoration of ritual implements plays an important role in this evolution, reflecting each culture’s aesthetic philosophy and artistic development. The structures and forms of these ritual objects offer essential data for cross-disciplinary studies in fields such as culture, religion, and anthropology. Ultimately, this type of research contributes to intercultural understanding and the preservation of cultural diversity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] BaoSiqin, & JinHai. (2007). A Study of the Spiritual Culture of the Grasslands. Hohhot, China: Inner Mongolia Education Press.

[2] Bjerken, Z. (2004, 10). Exorcising the Illusion of Bon “Shamans”: A Critical Genealogy of Shamanism in Tibetan Religions. Revue d 'etudes Tibetaines (Issue 6), pp. 4-59.

[3] Ermakov, D. (2008). Bө and Bön: Ancient Shamanic Traditions of Siberia and Tibet in their Relation to the Teachings of a Central Asian Buddha. Kathmandu, Nepal: Vajra Publications.

[4] Ermakov, D. (2011). Bon as a multifaceted phenomenon: looking beyond Tibet to the cultural and religious traditions of Eurasia. Bon, Zhang Zhung and Early Tibet. Foundation for the Preservation of Yungdrung Bön.

[5] ErmakovDmitry. (2011). Bon as a multifaceted phenomenon: looking beyond Tibet to the cultural and religious traditions of Eurasia. Bon, Zhang Zhung and Early Tibet.

[6] ErmakovDmitry. (2011). Bon as a multifaceted phenomenon: looking beyond Tibet to the cultural and religious traditions of Eurasia. U.K.: Foundation for the Preservation of Yungdrung Bön.

[7] HeissigWalther. (2016). The Religions of Mongolia. (GengSheng, translation) Beijing, China: China Tibetology Publishing House.

[8] Ramble, C. (2023). Bon Deity Trowo Tsochok Khagying: A Microcosm of the Bon Religion. New York City, USA: Rubin Museum of Art.

[9] Yan, C., & Zhao, Y. (2025). The functions and symbolic meanings of Bonpo apparel and accessories in ceremonial rituals. Arts & Communication.

[10] ZhangMu. (1991). Notes on Mongolian Nomadism. (Edited by ZhangZheng Ming, & SongJu Cheng) Shanxi Province, China: Shanxi People’s Publishing House.

Downloads

Published

30 May 2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, C., M. Molomjamts, & D. Ulziibayar. (2025). Comparative Study of the Culture, Attire, and Ritual Implements of Mongolian Shamanism and Tibetan Bon Religion. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 19(3), 242-245. https://doi.org/10.54097/fw8xdx97