Exploration of Teaching Reform in Computer Network Course based on "Four Integrations and Dual Enhancements"

Yadong Gong

doi:10.54097/yqeaje43

Authors

Yadong Gong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/yqeaje43

Keywords:

Computer Network, Four Integrations and Dual Enhancements, Teaching Reform, Innovative Practice

Abstract

With the rapid development of information technology, traditional computer network courses have gradually revealed issues of obsolescence and singularity in teaching content, methods, and practical aspects, making it difficult to meet the demands for cultivating high-quality innovative talents under the background of emerging engineering education. This research, centered on the core concept of "Four Integrations and Dual Enhancements," systematically promotes the teaching reform of computer network courses by focusing on the deep integration of four aspects: disciplinary competitions and course teaching, teaching and scientific research, the "Two Leaders and Three Learnings" mechanism, and basic knowledge with frontier trends. Through restructuring course content, innovating teaching methods, strengthening practical components, and improving the evaluation system, the aim is to achieve the "dual enhancements" of students' innovative thinking and practical abilities. Practice has shown that this model effectively stimulates students' learning initiative and enhances their comprehensive abilities and engineering literacy, offering positive reference significance for reforms in similar science and engineering courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x

[2] E. F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, and D. R. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9

[3] N. L. Fortenberry, J. E. Froyd, P. C. Litzinger, and R. L. Miller, “Improved first-year education through interdisciplinary project-based design courses,” in Proc. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf. (FIE), Reno, NV, USA, 2001, pp. T3E-1-T3E-6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2001.963916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2001.963916

[4] J. Turns, B. Sattler, and D. Kilgore, “Educating for sociotechnical responsibility: A review of engineering education reform,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 237–260, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20492

[5] K. E. Johnson, R. A. Streveler, and M. J. Smith, “A comparative study of capstone design courses in ABET-accredited programs in the United States,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 654–665, 2017.

[6] M. Z. Zhang, H. H. Chen, and P. X. Liu, “Project-based learning in computer networking: Impact on student performance and engagement,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 283–290, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TE.2020.2983210.