From "Policy Silos" to "Talent Ecosystem": A Study on the Synergistic Governance Shift of Local Urban "Attraction, Cultivation, Retention, and Utilization" Policy Chains

Authors

  • Yingmei Li
  • Jinpeng Zeng
  • Feng Zhong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/d2sts698

Keywords:

Policy Silos, Talent Ecosystem, Attraction, Cultivation, Retention, and Utilization (ACRU), Synergistic Governance, Governance Shift, Qualitative Analysis

Abstract

In the current era of "white-hot" regional talent competition, the talent policy systems of local cities are undergoing a profound paradigm shift. However, the phenomenon of "policy silos" under traditional bureaucracy remains severe. Various functional departments act independently in the "attraction, cultivation, retention, and utilization" (ACRU) stages of talent work, leading to broken policy chains, resource misallocation, and internal friction of efficacy. Focusing on this governance dilemma and using "talent ecosystem" theory as a lens, this paper constructs an analytical framework for the synergistic governance shift from "policy silos" to a "talent ecosystem." This study employs qualitative research methods, conducting a "thick description" of a typical case of a late-developing, catch-up local city (City C), supplemented by policy text coding and semi-structured interviews. It systematically reveals four typical representations of "policy silos" on the ACRU chain: "link silos" (prioritizing attraction over retention), "supply-demand silos" (decoupling of cultivation and utilization), "departmental silos" (fragmented governance by multiple bodies), and "talent-industry silos" (separation of human capital and industrial development). The study argues that the core essence of achieving this governance shift lies in promoting four transformations: a conceptual shift from "element management" to "habitat cultivation," a value shift from "government-centric" to "talent-centric," a structural shift from "linear segmentation" to "networked synergy," and a model shift from "sole dominance" to "multi-actor co-governance." Finally, from the perspective of governance reconstruction, this paper proposes four core pathways to realize this shift: constructing a "holistic" synergistic governance hub, re-engineering a "closed-loop" policy operational process, innovating "precision" industrial embedding tools, and establishing a "long-cycle" ecosystem evaluation orientation. This study aims to provide theoretical insights and practical guidance for local cities to overcome the "fragmentation" dilemma in talent policy and build high-level talent ecosystem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] He, J. Z., & Chu, X. (2022). Tizhi zhengti xing zhili shijiao xia difang zhengfu kua bumen xietong de shixian jizhi yanjiu—Yige G shi ‘yi wang tong guan’ gaige weili [A study on the realization mechanism of inter-departmental synergy in local government from the perspective of holistic governance: A case study of G City's 'One-Network Unified Management' reform]. E-Government, (11), 31-41.

[2] Sun, R., Ding, G., & Yao, Y. (2021). Rencai shengtai xitong xietong yanhua: Yige lilun kuangjia [Talent Ecosystem Synergistic Evolution: A Theoretical Framework]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, (10), 154-160.

[3] Wang, H. Y., & Miao, L. (2019). Zhongguo quyu rencai jingzheng: Tezheng, tiaozhan yu qushi [China's Regional Talent Competition: Characteristics, Challenges, and Trends]. Administrative Reform, (5), 26-32.

[4] Liu, X., & Li, Y. P. (2020). Weishenme “qiang” lai de rencai liu bu zhu?-Jiyu gongzuo qianru xing shijiao de fenxi [Why can't "snatched" talent be retained? -An analysis based on the perspective of work embeddedness]. Management World, 36(7), 143-157.

[5] Zhang, H. B., & Zhang, N. (2021). “Zhengti xing zhili” heyi youxiao? Yige wenxian pingshu [How is "Holistic Governance" effective? A literature review]. Public Administration Review, 14(3), 185-208.

[6] Yu, J. X., & Zheng, X. (2022). Zhengti xing zhili de Zhongguo tujing: Lilun, shijian yu weilai [The Chinese landscape of holistic governance: Theory, practice, and future]. Chinese Public Administration, (6), 6-16.

[7] Han, Z. M., & Fan, X. G. (2020). Jiaoyi chengben, yingshang huanjing yu gao zhiliang fazhan [Transaction Costs, Business Environment, and High-Quality Development]. Reform, (1), 69-79.

[8] General Office of the CPC Central Committee, & General Office of the State Council. (2021). Guanyu wanshan keji chengguo pingjia jizhi de zhidao yijian [Guiding Opinions on Improving the S&T Achievement Evaluation Mechanism].

[9] Mi, J. N., & Wang, C. X. (2Next). Difang rencai zhengce xietong de “duandian” yu “dudian”—Jiyu G shi de tansuo xing anli yanjiu [The "breaking points" and "blocking points" of local talent policy synergy: An exploratory case study based on G City]. Public Management and Policy Review, (4), 118-132.

[10] Zeng, X. Q., & Jia, X. X. (2024). Xin zhi shengchan li fazhan de rencai zhicheng jizhi yanjiu [Research on the talent support mechanism for the development of new quality productive forces]. Economist, (3), 67-76.

Downloads

Published

23-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles