Cross-Level Coordination and Precise Resource Downward Allocation: The Practice Logic of "Government-Led, Town-Village Linkage" Assistance Mechanism in Rural Revitalization
A case study of Qingyuan City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/4c3sws45Keywords:
Cross-Level Coordination, Resource Downward Allocation, Government-Led, Town-Village Linkage, Hundreds, Thousands, and Ten Thousands Project, Rural Revitalization, Qingyuan ExperienceAbstract
In the macro context of comprehensively promoting rural revitalization and the in-depth implementation of the "High-quality Development Project for Hundreds of Counties, Thousands of Towns, and Tens of Thousands of Villages" (hereinafter referred to as the "Hundreds, Thousands, and Ten Thousands Project") in Guangdong Province, underdeveloped areas face a dual dilemma: the "fragmentation" of external assistance resources and the "weakness" of internal grassroots undertaking capabilities. How to break the departmental segmentation of the bureaucratic system and achieve the precise transformation of policy resources from "suspension" to "implementation" is a core issue in the modernization of county-level governance. The "Government-Led, Town-Village Linkage" assistance model explored by Qingyuan City provides a highly explanatory observation sample for understanding cross-level collaborative governance and precise resource downward allocation. Based on the theoretical perspectives of holistic governance and organizational sociology, this study constructs an analytical framework of "Structure-Process-Mechanism" to deeply analyze the operational mechanism of this model. The study finds that the model reshapes the power structure of resource allocation through the vertical administrative coordination of "Government Leadership," integrating dispersed departmental resources into "policy potential energy." Simultaneously, through the horizontal organizational reshaping of "Town-Village Linkage," it constructs an interest community of "Strong Towns Leading Villages," activating the endogenous undertaking carriers at the grassroots level. Under the political logic of Party building guidance, these two aspects form a closed-loop practice logic of "Administrative Empowerment-Organizational Absorption-Interest Linkage," effectively resolving the "last mile" obstruction in resource implementation and realizing an endogenous transformation from "blood-transfusion" assistance to "hematopoietic" development. The article further points out that to establish the long-term effectiveness of this mechanism, it is necessary to be wary of "mobilization fatigue" under administrative dominance, promote the shift of governance focus from one-way administrative intervention to two-way pluralistic co-governance, and deepen the market-oriented reform of the collective economy of towns and villages to achieve the sustainable release of assistance efficiency.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen, X. (2024). Research on the Legal Guarantee of "Hundreds, Thousands, and Ten Thousands Project" under the Background of Rural Revitalization. Law Forum, 39(02), 5-16.
[2] He, X. (2020). Resource Going to the Countryside and the Involution of Rural Governance: Also on the Implementation of Rural Revitalization Strategy. CASS Journal of Political Science, (03), 78-89.
[3] Zhou, F. (2021). Rural Revitalization and the Readjustment of the Relationship between the State and Peasants: An Analysis Based on the "Project System". Sociological Studies, 36(06), 45-67.
[4] Yu, J., & Ren, J. (2021). Rural Revitalization under the Vision of Common Prosperity: Theoretical Interpretation and Practical Path. CASS Journal of Political Science, (06), 13-26.
[5] Chen, W., & Huang, J. (2023). Cross-Level Collaborative Governance: Research on the Interaction Mechanism of "City-County-Town" Governments in Rural Revitalization. Chinese Public Administration, (08), 45-53.
[6] Zheng, Y., & Huang, L. (2023). Chinese Modernization and Rural Revitalization: Guangdong's Exploration and Practice. Journal of Public Management, 20(01), 1-10.
[7] Luo, B. (2024). Empowering Rural Revitalization: Factor Allocation and Institutional Supply. South China Journal of Economics, (01), 12-25.
[8] Li, X., & Yu, L. (2022). The Modernity of Rural Construction and the Path Selection of Rural Revitalization. Issues in Agricultural Economy, (09), 4-12.
[9] Zhang, X., & Zhang, G. (2021). Embedded Governance: The Operational Mechanism and Logic of Party Building Leading Rural Revitalization. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 21(03), 1-11.
[10] Wang, X. (2022). Political Potential Energy and Governance Efficacy: The Logic Transformation of Party Building Leading Grassroots Governance. Exploration and Free Views, (05), 68-76.
[11] Jing, Y. (2023). Party-State System and Modernization of State Governance: Reflections Based on Rural Revitalization Practice. Social Sciences in China, (04), 45-62.
[12] Xu, Y., & Deng, D. (2024). Property Rights and Governance Rights: A Political Economy Analysis of Rural Governance. CASS Journal of Political Science, (02), 33-45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







