Transitivity Analysis of Character Agency in A Rose for Emily

Authors

  • Keying Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/89td1s81

Keywords:

A Rose for Emily, Transitivity, Stylistic Analysis

Abstract

As an important representative work of William Faulkner, a leading figure of the Southern Renaissance, A Rose for Emily has long been a focus of literary research. This study analyzes this short story by applying the transitivity system in Halliday's systematic functional grammar, exploring how Faulkner alters Emily Grilson's role in the transitivity process within the five sections of the story, aiming to reveal the functions of process type patterns and participant roles in shaping character agency, social power relations, and thematic meaning. This study shows that although Emily is the protagonist, in most sentences she is deprived of active social actions, and the people of the town, as collective narrators, occupy the dominant position of Actors, Sensers and Sayers, confining her to a symbol of the southern nobility. Faulkner's language choices led to this imbalance. The static description at the end makes Emily a tragic subject shaped by patriarchy, social customs and the decline of the Southern nobility. This study verified the interpretive ability of transitivity system for literary works and provided theoretical and practical inspirations for the analysis of literary discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Faulkner W, Carradine J, Huston A. (1958). A Rose for Emily. Paderborn, De: Verlag F. Schöningh.

[2] Nebeker, H. E. (1970). Emily's Rose of Love: A Postscript. Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association, 24(4): 190-191.

[3] Gallotti, Mattia and Raphael Lyne. 2019. The Individual “We” Narrator. The British Journal of Aesthetics 59. 2 (April):179–95.

[4] Melczarek, N. (2009). Narrative motivation in Faulkner's A Rose for Emily. The Explicator, 67(4): 237-243.

[5] Burg, J., Boyle, A.& Lang, S. D. (2000). Using Constraint Logic Programming to Analyze the Chronology in “A Rose for Emily”. Computers and the Humanities, 34: 377-392.

[6] Barani, F. &Yahya, W. R. W. (2014). Binary Opposition, Chronology of Time and Female Identity in William Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(2): 155-160.

[7] Ajmal, M., Siddiqui, S., & Hafeez, A. (2023). Comparing the Theme of Submissiveness in James Joyce's' Eveline' and William Faulkner's' A Rose for Emily.'. International Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Translation Studies, 3(i), 124.

[8] Giang, N. T., & Dan, T. C. (2024). An analysis of feminist criticism and description of the portrayal of women in the multi-level and traditional society in the selected work A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner. European Journal of Literary Studies, 5(2).

[9] Wilany, E. (2016). Symbols in William Faulkner’s Short Story “A Rose for Emily”: A Semiotics Approach. JCP Journal Cahaya Pendidika, 2(1).

[10] Abdurrahman, I. B. (2016). A Stylistic Analysis of Complexity in William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily". Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(4): 220-230.

[11] Xiao, M. (1999). Study of William Faulkner. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

[12] Liu, X. M. (1997). Theme, Characters, and Artistic Techniques - Reading Notes on "The Rose Dedicated to Emily" and Discussion with Mr. Xiao Minghan Appreciation of Masterpieces, (06): 101-105

[13] Zhen, S. (2016). Interpretation of A Rose for Emily from a Feminist Perspective. In Proceedings of The Fifth Northeast Asia International Symposium on Language, Literature and Translation, pp. 378-382.

[14] An, S., & Li, S. (2022, February). Analysis of A Rose for Emily from Feminist Perspective. In 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021), p. 613-616. Atlantis Press.

[15] Sun, X. (2025). The Subversion of Female Image in A Rose for Emily: The Contrast with the General Female Images. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 9(5).

[16] Zhang, Y. (2016 July). A Rose Will Never Bloom: Doomed Tragedy of Miss Emily. In 2016 2nd International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2016), pp. 19-22. Atlantis Press.

[17] Min, H. Y. (2025). The Withered Rose and Decay of the South: Symbolic Systems in A Rose for Emily. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 15(5): 383-390.

[18] Bai, H. X. (2016). Research on Interpersonal Meaning from the Perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics Shenyang Normal University

[19] Wang, M. Q. (2002). The narrative features of 'The Rose Dedicated to Emily' Foreign Languages (Journal of Shanghai Foreign Studies University), (02): 66-70

[20] Halliday, M. A. K. & C. Matthiessen. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd Edition). London: Arnold.

[21] Matthiessen, C. M. (1999). The system of TRANSITIVITY: An exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of language, 6(1): 1-51.

[22] Martin, J. R. (1996). Transitivity in Tagalog: a functional interpretation of case. Advances in discourse processes, 57: 229-296.

[23] Fawcett, R. P. (1987). The semantics of clause and verb for relational processes in English. New developments in systemic linguistics, 1: 130-183.

[24] Halliday, M. A. K., & Kress, G. R. (1976). System and function in language: Selected papers. Oxford University Press..

[25] He M. (2023). Analysis of the Symbolic Meaning of “Death” in A Rose for Emily. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(12): 101-105.

[26] Shen, D. (2006). Transitivity System and Deep Symbolic Meaning: A Stylistic Analysis of Hughes' On the Road Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (01): 4-10+80

[27] Liu, J. B. (2002). The Sacrifice of Society and Traditional Moral Concepts: A Study of the Fate of Women in Faulkner's Novels Journal of South China University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), (01): 70-72

Downloads

Published

23 December 2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lin, K. (2025). Transitivity Analysis of Character Agency in A Rose for Emily. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 21(3), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.54097/89td1s81