Data-Driven Governance of University Entrepreneurship Education: A Dynamic Evaluation Model based on Multi-Source Student Behavior Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/zdjm0c74Keywords:
Data-driven, University Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education, Educational Governance, Dynamic Evaluation Model, Multi-source Student BehaviorAbstract
To address practical dilemmas in university innovation and entrepreneurship (hereafter referred to as "innovation and entrepreneurship") education, such as unbalanced resource allocation and lagging evaluation, this study conducts research on data-driven governance of university innovation and entrepreneurship education based on the core logic of "data empowering decision-making" in educational governance. Integrating multi-source student behavior data from university academic management systems, student affairs systems, and innovation and entrepreneurship practice platforms, the research constructs a dynamic evaluation index system covering three dimensions: students' innovative literacy, practical participation, and project transformation. Machine learning algorithms are employed to build a prediction model for the effectiveness of innovation and entrepreneurship education, systematically revealing the impact mechanisms of governance interventions (e.g., curriculum optimization, resource matching, and mentor empowerment) on the improvement of students' innovation and entrepreneurship capabilities. Case verification is carried out in multiple universities of different types to test the practical effectiveness of the data-driven governance model. The innovation of this study lies in the deep integration of educational governance theory with data science, breaking through the limitations of empirical analysis in traditional innovation and entrepreneurship education research, and constructing a closed-loop governance framework of "data collection - model analysis - decision optimization - effect feedback". The research results provide replicable technical paths and theoretical support for the precise and scientific governance of university innovation and entrepreneurship education, align with the international research hotspot of "educational digital governance", and hold significant implications for promoting the high-quality development of university innovation and entrepreneurship education.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen, H. J. (2022). High-quality higher education: An explanation based on educational ecology. Jiangsu Higher Education, (1), 29-33.
[2] Du, H. R. (2023). On the ecosystem construction of innovation and entrepreneurship education in universities. Education Research Monthly, (2), 43-52.
[3] Zhang, L., & Schmidt, G. T. (2023). Assessing innovation and entrepreneurship education: Integrating outcome and process metrics in higher education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 26(2), 45–62.
[4] Zhou, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Tripartite collaborative governance for innovation-entrepreneurship education resource allocation: A government-university-enterprise synergy model. Journal of Higher Education Innovation, 15(2), 45-62.
[5] Zhou, H., et al. (2024). Research hotspots and future prospects of China's education governance in 2023. Journal of Education Governance, (1), 12-18.
[6] Wang, Y. X. (2022). Governance logic and practical path of innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities. China Higher Education, (5), 28-30.
[7] Zhong, B. L., & Fang, F. (2023). Key issues and practical paths of digital transformation in higher education. Educational Research, 44(4), 28-37.
[8] Zheng, Y. Q., & Yang, Z. F. (2024). The institutional dilemma and transcendence of the development of innovation and entrepreneurship education in universities. Higher Education Exploration, (2), 23-30.
[9] Zhao, L., & Liu, B. C. (2021). Experience and enlightenment of innovation and entrepreneurship education governance in foreign universities. Comparative Education Review, 43(8), 3-11.
[10] Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2022). A three-dimensional evaluation model for innovation and entrepreneurship education: Knowledge, ability, and literacy. Chinese Journal of Educational Technology, 41(4), 112–120.
[11] Chen, H., & Liu, R. (2024). Integrating governance factors into innovation-entrepreneurship education evaluation: Evidence from Chinese universities. Sustainability, 16(5), 1890.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







