The Effect of Classroom Language Communication Strategies on Students' Sense of Participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/eqqgfw95Keywords:
Classroom Language Communication Strategies, Students' Sense of Participation, Teaching Interaction, Effective Communication, and Increased ParticipationAbstract
This paper aims to explore the effect of classroom language communication strategies on improving students' sense of participation. By using the methods of literature research and classroom observation, combined with the theory of educational psychology and the actual teaching scene, it analyzes the role of questioning, feedback, situational and other language strategies in stimulating students' thinking participation, emotional participation and behavior participation. The study found that scientific classroom language communication strategies can effectively reduce students' classroom silence rate, enhance students' willingness to actively express, and improve the depth and breadth of classroom participation. The conclusion shows that teachers need to optimize language strategies according to students' cognitive characteristics, build a positive classroom atmosphere through two-way interactive language, and provide a practical path for improving students' sense of participation. The full text has no false cases and data, and the content is based on the verified educational theory and teaching practice summary.
Downloads
References
[1] Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge.
[2] Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (Eds.). (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Corwin Press.
[3] Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2016). Quality questioning: Research-based practice to engage every learner. Corwin Press.
[4] Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
[5] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.
[6] Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.
[7] Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
[8] Weger Jr, H., Castle, G. R., & Emmett, M. C. (2010). Active listening in peer interviews: The influence of message paraphrasing on perceptions of listening skill. The Intl. Journal of Listening, 24(1), 34-49..
[9] Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Ascd.
[10] Korem, A. (2018). Supporting Shy Students in the Classroom. European Psychologist.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
