Conceptualizing a Collaborative Ecosystem for Curriculum-Based Ideological-Political Education in Higher Education: A Case of a Public Relations Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/23r93576Keywords:
Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education (CIPE), Educational Ecology, Collaborative Ecosystem, Higher Education Reform, Feedback RegulationAbstract
In the context of ongoing reforms in Chinese higher education, curriculum-based ideological and political education (CIPE) has increasingly been promoted as a systematic approach to integrating value formation into disciplinary teaching. Yet existing practices often remain fragmented, relying on episodic “add-on” integration that yields limited coherence and sustainability. Drawing on an educational ecology perspective, this paper develops a collaborative ecosystem framework for CIPE and illustrates it through a public relations course. The proposed framework specifies (a) the structural components of the ecosystem (actors, resources, platforms, governance arrangements, and evaluation infrastructures), (b) the core mechanisms through which these components interact (cross-boundary coordination, contextualized learning design, resource circulation, and feedback-based regulation), and (c) the intended educational outcomes at learner, course, and organizational levels. By theorizing how ecological synergy can be generated and sustained, the study contributes a conceptually explicit and potentially transferable framework for understanding and designing CIPE as an integrated educational ecology rather than a set of isolated pedagogical techniques.
Downloads
References
[1] Grunig J E .Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management[J].Public Relations Review, 1995, 21(4):351-353.DOI:info:doi/10.1016/0363-8111(95)90118-3.
[2] Bowen, S. A. (2004). Expansion of ethics as the tenth generic principle of public relations excellence: A Kantian theory and model for managing ethical issues. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1601_3
[3] Liu W , He C .Curriculum-Based Ideological and Political Education: Research Focuses and Evolution[J].International Education Studies, 2022, 15(5):8.DOI:10.5539/ies.v15n5p28.
[4] Liu X , Xiantong Z , Starkey H .Ideological and political education in Chinese Universities: structures and practices[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2021(4):1-13.DOI:10.1080/02188791.2021.1960484.
[5] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
[6] Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
[7] Kolb D .Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development[J].Pearson Schweiz Ag, 1983, 1(3):p. 16-17.DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.07.003..
[8] Coombs W T .Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding[J]. 1999.
[9] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
[10] Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service-learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







