Nudging for Good: Can Behavioral Economics Improve Teenagers' Saving Habits?

Authors

  • Letian Pu
  • Tingshuo Zhang
  • Guji Han
  • Cynthia Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3kevaw59

Keywords:

Behavioral Economics, Nudging, Teenagers, Saving Habits, Financial Well-being

Abstract

Teenagers' saving habits are crucial for their financial well-being in adulthood, yet poor saving behaviors among adolescents have become a prevalent global issue. Traditional financial education often fails to effectively change teenagers' actual behaviors due to their limited self-control and cognitive biases. Behavioral economics, with its focus on "nudging"-subtle, non-coercive interventions that guide choices-provides a new perspective for addressing this problem. This paper systematically explores the application of behavioral economics in shaping teenagers' saving habits, analyzing the behavioral characteristics of teenagers that hinder saving, the theoretical basis of nudging interventions, and practical cases of effective nudges. The research finds that teenagers are prone to present bias, lack of future orientation, and mental accounting fallacies, which undermine their saving intentions. Nudging strategies such as default options, goal setting, and feedback mechanisms can effectively mitigate these biases and promote positive saving behaviors. Finally, the paper puts forward suggestions for constructing a multi-dimensional nudging system involving families, schools, and financial institutions to help teenagers develop sustainable saving habits, laying a solid foundation for their long-term financial health.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] OECD. (2020). Financial Literacy and Inclusion for Youth: Policy and Practice [R]. Paris: OECD Publishing.

[2] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow [M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[3] Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press.

[4] O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing It Now or Later [J]. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103-124.

[5] Steinberg, L. (2008). A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking [J]. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78-106.

[6] Shefrin, H. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1988). The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis [J]. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609-643.

[7] Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion [M]. New York: HarperBusiness.

[8] Bertrand, M., Luttmer, E. F., & Mullainathan, S. (2000). Network Effects and Welfare Cultures [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 1019-1055.

[9] Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149-1187.

[10] Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans [J]. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.

[11] Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory [M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

[12] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being [J]. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

[13] Berg, A., & Zia, B. (2013). Nudging Savers: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Bolivia [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 102, 86-104.

[14] Lim, S. H., & Teo, H. H. (2021). Gamified Nudging for Teenage Savings: Evidence from a Singaporean Fintech App [J]. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 92, 101685.

[15] Bruhn, M., & Zia, B. (2013). Stimulating Savings: A Field Experiment in Bolivia [J]. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 83-105.

Downloads

Published

19 January 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pu, L., Zhang, T., Han, G., & Liu, C. (2026). Nudging for Good: Can Behavioral Economics Improve Teenagers’ Saving Habits?. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 22(1), 116-118. https://doi.org/10.54097/3kevaw59