"To Repair is to Care": A Feminist Perspective on Ceramic Restoration and an Ethics of Dependence

Authors

  • Wenxuan Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/4f1pw735

Keywords:

Care Ethics, Ceramic Restoration, Feminist Materialism, Ethics of Dependence, Kintsugi, Material Culture, Vulnerability

Abstract

There is no investigation of ethics for ceramic restorations at this point in feminism's study. However, in terms of those who are responsible for restoring broken things, attending to one's material life, making decisions about keeping or discarding what one has... These have structural parallels with the caregiving activities that feminist ethics has been studying over nearly a quarter century. From the perspective of care ethics and feminist materialism, this article argues that ceramic restorations are indeed instances of ethical activities with broader theoretical implications beyond object conservation alone. Based on GILLIGAN'S care ethics, KITTAY' s ethic of dependability, BUTLER'S account of vulnerability, BARAD'S feminist materialism, AND UNESCO cultural heritage documentation, This article explores how restoration Practices expose the work of caring; Perform an ethical dimension of Dependence Among People And Things; And present A Material Critique Of Perfectionist Standards And Discard Norms In Contemporary Culture. The Japanese practice of kintsugi can serve as a model case for repair as both an aesthetic principle and moral stance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.

[2] Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.

[3] Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. Routledge.

[4] Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.

[5] Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

[6] Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

[7] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention

[8] Adamson, G. (2013). The invention of craft. Bloomsbury.

[9] Risatti, H. (2007). A theory of craft: Function and aesthetic expression. University of North Carolina Press.

[10] Jackson, S. J. (2014). Rethinking repair. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 221–240). MIT Press.

[11] Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.

[12] Robinson, F. (1999). Globalizing care: Ethics, feminist theory, and international relations. Westview Press.

[13] Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.

[14] Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106.

[15] Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

[16] Gregson, N., Metcalfe, A., & Crewe, L. (2009). Practices of object maintenance and repair: How consumers attend to consumer objects within the home. Journal of Consumer Culture, 9(2), 248–272.

[17] Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 1–25.

[18] Henare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (Eds.). (2007). Thinking through things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically. Routledge.

[19] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

[20] Weil, S. E. (1999). From being about something to being for somebody: The ongoing transformation of the American museum. Daedalus, 128(3), 229–258.

Downloads

Published

14 June 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xu, W. (2026). "To Repair is to Care": A Feminist Perspective on Ceramic Restoration and an Ethics of Dependence. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 23(3), 91-93. https://doi.org/10.54097/4f1pw735