Research on Paradigm Reconstruction and Practical Path of Interdisciplinary Teaching Evaluation Empowered by Artificial Intelligence

Authors

  • Xueping Zhang Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5t6ts065

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Interdisciplinary Teaching, Teaching Evaluation, Paradigm Reconstruction, Practical Path

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence, AI technology has become a core driving force for educational innovation and development, especially in the field of interdisciplinary learning. Against the backdrop of digital education transformation, this paper analyzes the limitations of traditional interdisciplinary evaluation paradigms from the dimensions of evaluation objectives, data collection and evaluator participation. It proposes a four-dimensional reconstruction of interdisciplinary teaching evaluation: shifting from knowledge-centered objectives to competency-oriented objectives, transforming terminal summative evaluation to full-process tracking evaluation, upgrading static testing methods to dynamic diagnostic methods, and expanding single-subject evaluation to multi-stakeholder collaborative evaluation. From a practical perspective, this paper constructs a whole-process evaluation system covering pre-class diagnosis, in-class collaboration and post-class extension, and innovates intelligent application paths for portfolio assessment, group cooperative evaluation and concept map evaluation. The study emphasizes that AI-enabled evaluation must adhere to three principles: student-demand orientation, the irreplaceable dominant role of teachers, and technical practicability, so as to provide a complete theoretical framework and operable implementation schemes for the digital transformation of interdisciplinary teaching evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen, D. K., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Innovation in interdisciplinary teaching in the AI era. Education of Hubei, (7), 8–9.

[2] Yang, X., & Shang, W. (2024). Value orientation and systematic design of evidence-based interdisciplinary teaching evaluation. Research in Educational Development, 44(18), 76–84.

[3] Ministry of Education of PRC. (2018). Action plan for educational informatization 2.0. Gazette of the Ministry of Education, (4), 118.

[4] Du, W. B. (2024). Design and implementation of interdisciplinary thematic learning under the new curriculum standard. E-education Research, 45(4), 81–87.

[5] Dong, Y., Chen, H., & Yu, H. (2025). Design, implementation and evaluation of interdisciplinary thematic learning empowered by digital intelligence. E-education Research, 46(5), 78–85.

[6] Dong, Y., & Chen, H. (2024). Generative AI-driven cultivation of interdisciplinary innovative thinking: Mechanism and model construction. Modern Educational Technology, 34(4), 5–15.

[7] Yu, Q. (2025). Research on interdisciplinary teaching evaluation in primary mathematics and science classes. Parents, (11), 71–73.

[8] Ren, J. F., & Qi, Y. Z. (2020). Design of project-based learning activities for cultivating innovative thinking. E-education Research, 41(3), 108–113.

Downloads

Published

16 August 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, X. (2026). Research on Paradigm Reconstruction and Practical Path of Interdisciplinary Teaching Evaluation Empowered by Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 24(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.54097/5t6ts065