Project-Driven Teaching Innovation for Fundamental Courses of Computer-Related Majors with Self-Developed Experimental Devices

Authors

  • Ping Shao School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, Guangdong, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/depjce09

Keywords:

Project-Driven Teaching, Self-Developed Experimental Devices, Computer Fundamentals, Practical Cognition

Abstract

Addressing the disconnection between theory and practice, the mismatch between experimental devices and textbooks, and the fragmentation of chapter-level experiments in computer fundamentals courses for computer-related majors, this paper proposes a project-driven teaching innovation model using the first-year course "Computer Cognition and Practice" as a case study. Built upon the self-published textbook "Computer Cognition and Training" (Tsinghua University Press, 2022) and a set of self-developed experimental devices, the model adopts a "One Device Throughout" design-the same devices run through most chapters with progressively deepening applications-and constructs a four-stage progressive cognitive path: cognition, verification, design experience, and innovation experience. The devices serve dual functions as a soldering quality inspection tool and a microcontroller cognition experimental platform, and incorporate extended AI experiences such as speech recognition. Teaching practice shows that the model effectively improves students’ practical ability and professional learning interest. The textbook has been adopted by more than 30 universities nationwide with a cumulative circulation of 1,800 copies, and the outcome won the first prize of university-level teaching achievement awards. The model is replicable and scalable, providing a systematic reference for practical teaching reform in local universities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhang, Y., Cao, L., & Wang, W. (2022). Analysis and countermeasures of teaching pain points in basic computer courses under the background of emerging engineering education. J. Anqing Normal Univ. (Natural Sci. Ed.), 28(4), 99 102.

[2] Hu, H., & Xia, H. (2023). Main characteristics, learning sequences and teacher actions of project based learning from the perspective of the third space. Global Education, 52(12), 120 128.

[3] Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project based learning. Autodesk Foundation.

[4] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

[5] Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. Int. J. Educ. Res., 102, Article 101586.

[6] Ke, Q., Fang, Y., & Zhai, Y. (2023). Innovation and practice of ‘dual coordination’ industry education integration cultivation model for engineering professional degree postgraduates. Res. Higher Educ. Eng., (3), 53 58.

[7] Dong, X., Ma, R., & Wang, J. (2023). Design of an experimental teaching platform for the working mechanism of intelligent agricultural equipment based on open source hardware. Exp. Technol. Manage., 40(4), 162 167.

[8] Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.

[9] Li, Z., & Wang, Z. (2021). Outcome based curriculum teaching design. Higher Educ. Dev. Eval., 37(3), 91 98.

[10] Wu, Y. (2018). Building China’s ‘golden courses’. China Univ. Teaching, (12), 4 9.

[11] Zhong, D. (2017). Connotation and actions of emerging engineering education construction. Res. Higher Educ. Eng., (3), 1 6.

[12] Shao, P., et al. (2022). Computer cognition and practical training. Tsinghua Univ. Press.

Downloads

Published

13 September 2026

Issue

Section

Articles