The Publication of Traditional Chinese Book for Foreigners in China

Authors

  • Zhou Li
  • Huacheng Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v3i2.801

Keywords:

Book publishing, Cultural security, Integrity and innovation.

Abstract

The survey shows that some foreigners in China do not take the initiative to choose Chinese books. The local Chinese books that can better reflect Chinese elements, such as political, cultural and historical books, do not occupy the forefront of the range of books that foreigners in China are willing to buy and read. With the increasing number of foreigners residing in China, it is necessary to prevent foreigners in China from boycotting buying and reading Chinese books. The publishing industry should seize the advantages of market expansion, actively shoulder its due political and cultural responsibilities, actively plan to publish Chinese books with Chinese elements for foreigners in China, ensure that the contents of books are correct and the prices are moderate on the macro level, and strive to make books of high quality and diverse forms on the micro level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wangyanfeia.A brief talk on the current situation of the publication of Chinese as a foreign language books [J].Journal of Jilin radio and Television University.2005(3):126-128

Wangl inlinas,zhaojinhuash.Research on the legislation of universal reading from the perspective of soft law[J].China Press.2017(3):24-27

Wang Fan.Research on media use and effects of foreigners in china[D].Fudan University,2012;

Jindehoump.Teachingof foreigners ‘classical Chinese reading[j].Language teaching and research.1981(3):74-81

Qi gexiang.Innovation strategy of publishing enterprises'going out under the background of media convergence [J].Science and technology and publishing.2019 (11):32-37

Downloads

Published

7 July 2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, Z., & Li, H. (2022). The Publication of Traditional Chinese Book for Foreigners in China. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(2), 60-63. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v3i2.801