The Paradox of Creative Work: Exploring Autonomy and Inequality in the Cultural and Creative Industries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v9i1.9369Keywords:
Creative work, Autonomy, Cultural industries, Creative industries, Employment, Precariousness, Income inequality.Abstract
This article investigates the notion of the "creative worker" in the context of the cultural and creative industries. It examines the positive aspects of creative employment, such as autonomy, self-expression, and a dynamic workplace. Nevertheless, it highlights the paradoxical nature of creative work, in which employees frequently confront precarious and exploitative conditions. The article discusses the disparities creative workers face, including the prevalence of insecure and project-based contracts, mental health issues, and gender, ethnicity, and class disparities. Using empirical evidence and scholarly debates, this article challenges the notion of a meritocratic creative economy and raises concerns about the systemic barriers marginalised groups encounter. It provides a comprehensive examination of the realities and complexities of working in the creative industries.
Downloads
References
Americans for the Arts (2005). Creative Industries 2005: The State Report. Americans for the Arts.
Banks, M. (2007). The politics of cultural work. Basingstoke ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Banks, M. and Hesmondhalgh, D., 2009. Looking for work in creative industries policy. International journal of cultural policy, 15(4), pp.415-430.
Bectu (2020, March 8). Freelancers’ top fear is how to pay the bills, finds Bectu coronavirus survey. [online] Bectu. Available: https://bectu.org.uk/news/freelancers-top-fear-is-how-to-pay-the-bills-finds-bectu-coronavirus-survey/?s=unequal%20pay&f=news [Accessed 1 Dec. 2021].
Bectu (2020). Free parties and video-streams don’t pay the bills so I’m looking elsewhere for a livelihood. [online] Bectu. Available: https://bectu.org.uk/news/free-parties-and-video-streams-dont-pay-the-bills-so-im-looking-elsewhere-for-a-livelihood/?s=unequal%20pay&f=news [Accessed 1 Dec. 2021].
Conor, B., Gill, R. and Taylor, S. (2015). Gender and creative labour. The Sociological Review, 63, pp.1-22.
Creigh-Tyte, A. and Thomas, B. (2001), “Employment”, in Selwood, S. (Ed.), The UK Cultural Sector: Profile and Policy Issues, Policy Studies Institute, London.
DCMS (2001). Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: DCMS.
DCMS (2005). Creative Industries Economic Estimates Statistical Bulletin. London: DCMS.
DCMS (2016). Creative Industries: Focus on Employment. [online] DCMS, pp.1–32.Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/534305/Focus_on_Employment_revised_040716.pdf [Accessed 1 December 2021].
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise Of The Creative Class. S.L.: Basic Books.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford university press.
Gill, R. (2002). Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Euro. Information, communication & society, 5(1), pp.70-89.
Gill, R. (2014). Unspeakable inequalities: Post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity, and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 21(4), pp.509-528.
Gross, S.A. and Musgrave, G. (2017). Can music make you sick? A study into the incidence of musicians’ mental health. Part 2: Qualitative study and recommendations.[Westminster]: UW/Music Tank.
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2007). The Cultural Industries. London: Sage.
Homa Khaleeli (2014, June 21). Lenny Henry: diversity in the TV industry “is worth fighting for.” The Guardian. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2014/jun/20/lenny-henry-interview-diversity-tv-industry [Accessed 7 December, 2021].
Hough, A. (2012, September 03). Julie Walters warns of future where only “posh” can afford to act [online] The Telegraph. Available: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/9515821/Julie-Walters-warns-of-future-where-only-posh-can-afford-to-act.html [Accessed 1 Dec. 2021].
Leadbeater, C. and Oakley, K. (1999). The independents. London: Demos.
Lewis, S. (2003). The integration of paid work and the rest of life. Is post‐industrial work the new leisure?. Leisure studies, 22(4), pp.343-345.
Littler, J. (2013). Meritocracy as plutocracy: The marketising of'Equality'under neoliberalism. New Formations, 80(80), pp.52-72.
Löfgren, O. (2003). The new economy: a cultural history. Global Networks, 3(3), pp.239-254.
McRobbie, A. (2002). Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural studies, 16(4), pp.516-531.
NESTA (2013). [online] Available: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/a-manifesto-for-the-creative-economy-april13.pdf [Accessed 26 November 2021].
Nixon, S. and Crewe, B. (2004) Pleasure at Work? Gender, Consumption and Work-Based Identities in the Creative Industries, Consumption, Markets and Culture 7(2): 129– 147.
O’Brien, D., Laurison, D., Miles, A. and Friedman, S. (2016). Are the creative industries meritocratic? An analysis of the 2014 British Labour Force Survey. Cultural Trends, 25(2), pp.116–131.
Scharff, C. (2015). Equality and diversity in the classical music profession. London: King’s College London.
Thanki, A. and Jefferys, S. (2007). Who are the fairest? ethnic segmentation in London’s media production. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 1(1).
