Analysis of the Evolution Law of China's Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions

Authors

  • Yunhong Chi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v19i.11997

Keywords:

Carbon Emissions, GDP, Environment Kuznet Curve (EKC), Clean Energy.

Abstract

Global CO2 emissions are on the rise, thus governments are increasingly concerned about carbon emissions. As the trend of China's carbon emissions is also changing, previous studies have looked for factors affecting carbon emissions, including energy and economy, etc. This paper uses the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory to have a descriptive statistical analysis of carbon emissions and related economic indicators in mainland China. In the period that follows, China's energy demand potential is huge, but it also faces a severe CO₂ emission reduction challenge. Improving energy efficiency and optimizing energy mix are effective solutions to China's carbon emission problem. China still has a long way to go in industrializing its economy and strengthening the structural transformation of the service sector, characterized by rapid development and huge energy demand. This study will help us to understand the evolution of carbon emissions in China and provide guidance for future carbon emission management and mitigation. Further research and actions to improve energy efficiency, adjust industrial structure and promote clean energy development are important for reducing China's carbon emissions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ZHAO X R, ZHANG X, SHAO S. Decoupling CO₂ emissions and industrial growth in China over 1993 - 2013: The role of investment [J]. Energy Economics,2016, 60: 275 - 292.

KRAFT J, KRAFT A. On the relationship between energy and GNP [J]. Journal of Energy Development,1978, 3: 401 - 403.

Bin Xu, Clean Energy Development, Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction and Regional Economic Growth, [J] Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54 (07): 188 - 202.

SARI R, MEHMET U. The relationship between disaggregated country risk ratings and stock market movements: an ARDL approach. [J]. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 2013, 49: 4 - 16.

BOWDEN N, PAYNE J. The causal relationship between U.S. energy consumption and real output: a disaggregated analysis [J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2009, 31 (2): 180 - 188.

STERN DI. Energy and economic growth in the USA: A multivariate approach [J]. Energy Economics,1993,15 (2): 137 - 150.

WARD J D, SUTTON P C, WERNER A D. Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? [J]. Plos One, 2016, 11 (10): e0164733.

KOURTZIDIS S A. Re-evaluating the energy consumption-economic growth nexus for the United States: an asymmetric threshold cointegration analysis [J]. Energy, 2018,148: 537 - 545.

GROSSMAN G M, KRUEGER A B. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement [J]. CEPR Discussion Papers, 1992, 8 (2):223 - 250.

LIN B, LIU H. CO₂ emissions of China's commercial and residential buildings: evidence and reduction policy [J]. Building and Environment, 2015, 92: 418 - 431.

Downloads

Published

02-11-2023