Endowment Effect: From the Perspective of Employees’ Loyalty, Perceived Value and Used Car Pricing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v21i.14338Keywords:
Endowment effect, Employee loyalty, Emotional factors, Secondhand car pricing.Abstract
The "endowment effect," a central cognitive bias in behavioral economics, represents individuals' tendency to assign a higher value to items they own compared to identical or similar items they don't possess. This research paper presents a comprehensive exploration of this effect and its diverse applications in three significant areas: bolstering employee loyalty, understanding the moderating role of emotional states in the perceived value of goods, and discerning pricing mechanisms in the secondhand car market. By leveraging the endowment effect, businesses can enhance employee loyalty and develop more effective pricing strategies in secondhand markets. Inherent in these applications is the opportunity to capitalize on inherent cognitive biases to optimize outcomes across different economic activities. Furthermore, understanding the interaction between emotional states, particularly positive emotions, and the endowment effect provides insights into consumer behavior, influencing their perceived value and purchasing intentions. The interplay between the endowment effect and emotional states offers a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted nature of consumer behavior. Thus, this research underscores the far-reaching implications of the endowment effect, highlighting its pervasive influence in our economic decision-making processes.
Downloads
References
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic perspectives, 1991, 5(1), 193-206.
Thaler, R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of EconomicBehavior & Organization, 1980, 1(1), 39-60.
Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of consumer research, 2000, 27(3), 360-370.
Beggan, J. K. On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1992, 62(2), 229.
Morewedge, C. K., & Giblin, C. E. Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2015, 19(6), 339-348.
Epley, N., Mak, D., & Idson, L. C. Bonus or rebate: The impact of income framing on spending and saving. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2006, 19(3), 213-227.
Ashby, N. J., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership. Judgment & Decision Making, 2012, 7(3), 254.
Weaver, R., & Frederick, S. A reference price theory of the endowment effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 2012, 49(5), 696-707.
Johnson, E. J., Häubl, G., & Keinan, A. Aspects of endowment: a query theory of value construction. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 2007, 33(3), 461.
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009, 36(3), 434-447.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. The quarterly journal of economics, 1991, 106(4), 1039-1061.
Strahilevitz, M. A., & Loewenstein, G. The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 1998, 25(3), 276-289.
Loewenstein, G., & Adler, D. A bias in the prediction of tastes. Economic Journal, 1995, 105(431), 929-937.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






