Analysis of the Connection Between Executive Remuneration and Corporate Fiscal Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/mf987z22Keywords:
Executive remuneration; corporate fiscal achievement; relationship; characteristicAbstract
The interplay between top executive pays and fiscal achievements remains at the forefront of discourse in organizational leadership and governance frameworks. Understanding the connection between executive incentives and performance outcomes is crucial for effective corporate governance. This study dives deep into the tapestry of research that dissects these nuanced interactions. Executive compensation, a critical component of corporate governance, directly influences the behaviors and decision-making of top executives. Simultaneously, financial performance serves as a key indicator of a company's operational health and ability to generate value. According to the analysis, the relationship between both is complete and multifaceted. In some cases, higher levels of executive remuneration are positively correlated with improved financial performance, while negative correlations also exist. The relationship between the two is influenced by characteristics, e.g., corporate governance, industry characteristics, company performance, and individual executive characteristics. Numerous studies are currently available on the relationship between the two. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations and shortcomings of the existing studies, which may impact the generalizability and applicability of the findings. In conclusion, the nexus between executive compensation and financial output is a complex and multidimensional issue that requires further in-depth research and study.
Downloads
References
Bendickson J, Muldoon J, Liguori E and Davis P E. Agency theory: the times, they are a-changin’. Management decision, 2016, 54(1): 174-193.
Deci E L, Ryan R M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
Christensen H B, Nikolaev V V, Wittenberg Moerman R. Accounting information in financial contracting: The incomplete contract theory perspective. Journal of accounting research, 2016, 54(2): 397-435, 2016
Salmi T, Martikainen T. A review of the theoretical and empirical basis of financial ratio analysis. News Group, 1994.
Lakonishok J, Shapiro A C. Stock returns, beta, variance and size: an empirical analysis. Financial analyst’s journal, 1984, 40(4): 36-41.
Sharma A K, Kumar S. Economic value added (EVA)-literature review and relevant issues. International Journal of economics and finance, 2010, 2(2): 200-220.
Kroes J R, Manikas A S. Cash flow management and manufacturing corporate financial performance: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 148: 37-50.
Bebchuk L, Grinstein Y. The growth of executive pay. Oxford review of economic policy, 2005, 21(2): 283-303.
Ni V. An empirical study on the impact of executive compensation on corporate performance in state-owned listed companies. Continental Bridge Perspectives 2013, 4: 90-92.
Xu H, Liu X. Decentralisation Reform, Compensation Control and Corporate Executive Corruption. Management World, 2013, 3: 119-132.
Cavaco S, Crifo P, Guidoux A. Corporate social responsibility and governance: The role of executive compensation. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 2020, 59(2): 240-274.
Wang Y T, Zhao Z Y, Wei X Y. Does board independence affect corporate performance, Economy Analysis, 2014?
Flammer C, Bansal P. Does a long‐term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(9): 1827-1847.
Zhang J, Kong D, Wu J. Doing good business by hiring directors with foreign experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 153: 859-876.
Gomez-Mejia L R, Larraza-Kintana M, Makri M. The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46(2): 226-237.
Gruca T S, Rego L L. Customer satisfaction, cash flow, and shareholder value. Journal of marketing, 2005, 69(3): 115-130.
Teece D J. Strategies for managing knowledge assets: the role of corporate structure and industrial context. Long range planning, 2000, 33(1): 35-54.
Du Y. Executive political capital, government grants and future value of loss-making corporates. Business Economics and Management, 2017, 37(5): 77-88.
Mankins M C, Steele R. Turning great strategy into great performance. Harvard business review, 2005, 2607.
Maak T, Pless N M, Voegtlin C. Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro‐foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 2016, 53(3): 463-493.
Bebchuk L A, Fried J M. Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard University Press, 2004.
Hall B J, Liebman J B. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, 113(3): 653-691.
Chen J, Zhang R, Liu B. The empirical study of executive compensation in China port and shipping listed companies based on the grey relational analysis. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 2016, 6(2): 259-269.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






