The Causes and Countermeasures of High Debt Ratio in Real Estate Enterprises

Authors

  • Yuting Shao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r8xej287

Keywords:

Asset liability ratio, Real estate, Optimization of capital structure.

Abstract

Real estate companies generally have a high debt to asset ratio, which not only brings more profits but also brings more risks. Therefore, maintaining a reasonable debt to asset ratio is of great significance to enterprises. This article first lists the significance of reducing the excessively high asset liability ratio of enterprises, and then analyzes the reasons for the high asset liability ratio of real estate enterprises. Targeted suggestions are given to address this phenomenon, hoping to provide some help for the optimization of the asset structure of real estate enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jianguo Y, Lin G. Proposal Distribution optimization for Endorsement Strategy in Hyperledger Fabric [J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2024, 80 (10): 15038 - 15065.

Yijing L, Nan H, Yaqiong Z, et al. Optimization of Capital Structure for Urban Water PPP Projects Using Mezzanine Financing: Sustainable Perspective [J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2023, 149 (8).

Eleonora K, Kristina Š, Nataša Š. Capital structure optimization: a model of optimal capital structure from the aspect of capital cost and corporate value [J]. Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 2023, 36 (2).

Jaromír V, Eva K, Zuzana D. Optimization of the capital structure of an agricultural company in the Czech Republic [J]. SHS Web of Conferences, 2022, 132.

Bibrautu G, Fuhadaus M, Sengko H. Capital Structure Optimization of Toll Road Project by Stages [J]. Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance, 2021, 4 (5).

Yongzhao Z. Financial Risk Analysis and Prevention of H Real Estate Company [J]. China Small and Medium Enterprises, 2020, (11): 173 - 174.

Zhaoheng L, Shunji Y. The Impact of Capital Structure on Corporate Debt Service Capability: A Case Study of Listed Commercial Real Estate in China [J]. China Business Review, 2020, (19): 127-128.

Wei W. Exploration of Capital Structure Optimization and Financial Risk Control in Private Enterprises [J] Investment and Entrepreneurship, 2024, 35 (08): 19 - 21.

Chuansen Y. Research on Capital Structure Optimization of L Company [D] Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2023.

Fenghua F. Research on Capital Structure Optimization and Financial Risk Management of Private Enterprises [J] China Industry and Economics, 2023, (18): 161 - 163.

Xin Z. Research on Enterprise Asset Securitization and Capital Structure Optimization [J] Finance and Economics, 2023 (17): 21 - 23.

Tian L. Research on the Optimization of Capital Structure of M Real Estate Enterprise under the Positioning of "Housing for Housing, not for speculation" [D] Inner Mongolia University, 2023.

sha L. Research on Capital Structure Optimization of Country Garden Group [D] Harbin Normal University, 2023.

Yongqiu L. Reflections on the Management of Operating Funds in Real Estate Enterprises [J]. Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2020, (18): 116 - 117.

Baolian Z, Luqi W. Optimization Measures Based on Problems in Enterprise Capital Structure [J]. Times Finance, 2020, (27): 59 - 60.

Zhiyu W. Research on Capital Structure Optimization and Financing Decision of Real Estate Enterprises [J]. Economic Management Abstract, 2020, (13): 43 - 44.

Junhua L. Can reducing corporate debt ratio improve corporate performance? [D] Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, 2019.

Feng D. Analysis of the Reform of Financial Management in State Owned Enterprises under the New Situation [J]. China Collective Economy, 2018, (30): 129 - 130.

Jing L. Research on Cash Flow Management of Real Estate Enterprises Based on the "Finance+Real Estate" Business Model [D]. South China University, 2018.

Downloads

Published

18-07-2024

How to Cite

Shao, Y. (2024). The Causes and Countermeasures of High Debt Ratio in Real Estate Enterprises. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 37, 558-562. https://doi.org/10.54097/r8xej287