The Effectiveness of Asset Pricing Models Under Special Conditions: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic, Emerging Markets, and Financial Crises

Rui Liu

doi:10.54097/4x80fa17

Authors

Rui Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/4x80fa17

Keywords:

Asset pricing models; Market anomalies; COVID-19 pandemic; Emerging markets; financial crises.

Abstract

Asset pricing models are important tools in finance. However, special market conditions can make them highly ineffective. This paper evaluates the performance of classical asset pricing models (that is, CAPM and Fama-French models) under three specific scenarios: the COVID-19 pandemic, emerging markets, and financial crises. Recent research and market data are reviewed to conclude that these models have very low efficiency in times of extreme occurrences for capturing proper asset valuations. Our findings reveal that standard models lose a substantial part of their explanatory power in periods of crises while new context-specific risk factors come into existence in other exceptional conditions. This work argues for the inclusion of liquidity and tail risk considerations, especially during market stress, as we also observe a greater need for more dynamic and adaptive modeling approaches that capture time-varying risk premia and factor loadings. The findings drive home the point that standard asset pricing models cannot be applied across the board in all market conditions and stress the need for developing more flexible and situation-specific valuation tools. Therefore, this research lies in its dual contribution, both in academic terms and practical finance, by providing an understanding of the behavior of asset pricing models in extreme markets and giving indications for future model development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mondello E. Dividend Discount Model. In Applied Fundamentals in Finance: Portfolio Management and Investments. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2023: 261-287.

[2] Elbannan M A. The capital asset pricing model: an overview of the theory. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2015, 7(1): 216-228.

[3] Darolles S, Duvaut P, Jay E. Multi-factor models and signal processing techniques: Application to quantitative finance. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

[4] Markowitz H. The utility of wealth. Journal of political Economy, 1952, 60(2): 151-158.

[5] Sharpe W F. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The journal of finance, 1964, 19(3): 425-442.

[6] Fama E F, French K R, Booth D G, Sinquefield R. Differences in the risks and returns of NYSE and NASD stocks. Financial Analysts Journal, 1993, 49(1): 37-41.

[7] Choudhry M T, Marelli E, Signorelli M. Financial crises and labour market performance. International Atlantic Economic Conference, Prague, 2010: 24-27.

[8] Vyas V, Mehta K, Sharma R. Investigating socially responsible investing behaviour of Indian investors using structural equation modelling. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2022, 12(2): 570-592.

[9] Liu Z, Huynh T L D, Dai P F. The impact of COVID-19 on the stock market crash risk in China. Research in international Business and Finance, 2021, 57: 101419.

[10] Lintner J. Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. The journal of finance, 1965, 20(4): 587-615.

[11] Mossin J. Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1966: 768-783.

[12] Fama E F, French K R. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial economics, 2015, 116(1): 1-22.

[13] Mazur M, Dang M, Vega M. COVID-19 and the March 2020 stock market crash. Evidence from S&P1500. Finance research letters, 2021, 38: 101690.

[14] Singh S, Yadav S S. Indian stock market and the asset pricing models. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 30: 294-304.

[15] Chan M K, Kwok S. Risk-sharing, market imperfections, asset prices: Evidence from China's stock market liberalization. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2017, 84: 166-187.

[16] Zaremba A, Szyszka A, Long H, Zawadka D. Business sentiment and the cross-section of global equity returns. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2020, 61: 101329.

[17] Asafo-Adjei E, Adam A M, Adu-Asare Idun A, Ametepi P Y. Dynamic Interdependence of Systematic Risks in Emerging Markets Economies: A Recursive‐Based Frequency‐Domain Approach. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 2022(1): 1139869.

[18] Hassan M K, Djajadikerta H G, Choudhury T, Kamran M. Safe havens in Islamic financial markets: COVID-19 versus GFC. Global Finance Journal, 2022, 54: 100643.

[19] Zaremba A, Maydybura A, Czapkiewicz A, Arnaut M. Explaining equity anomalies in frontier markets: A horserace of factor pricing models. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2021, 57(13): 3604-3633.

[20] Kelly B, Jiang H. Tail risk and asset prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 2014, 27(10): 2841-2871.

[21] Walker J S, Geyfman V, Tekatli N. An Examination of the Stability of Bank Betas during Extreme Market Volatility: The Case ff the Financial Crisis and the Pandemic. Banking and Finance Review, 2020, 12(1): 15-31.