Analysis of the Adaptation of the Belt and Road Initiative in the European Union: A Perspective Based on Multilateral Cooperation, Sociocultural and Sustainable Development

Authors

  • Yuanjun Ding
  • Yufan Hui
  • Yunfei Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/f12w8p49

Keywords:

Belt and Road; multilateral cooperation; sustainable development.

Abstract

As the center of gravity of the global economy gradually shifts to Asia, China has strengthened its influence in the international economic system through the Belt and Road Initiative. As an important pole of the global economy, how to maintain the competitiveness of the EU in the new situation has become an important issue. There are significant differences between EU member states in terms of their level of economic development, foreign policies and attitudes towards China. This diversity makes it more difficult for the EU to coordinate its reaction to the Belt and Road Initiative. This complicates the EU's efforts to coordinate its reaction to the Initiative. As a result, this study investigates multilateral cooperation, socio-cultural, and sustainable development viewpoints, concluding that the EU must improve collaboration, maximize internal coordination, and adhere to the goal of sustainable development. The paper also discusses the major economic issues arising from the policy coordination of EU member states to adapt to the Belt and Road Initiative and the solutions required for these challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mohan G. Europe’s response to the Belt and Road Initiative. German Marshall Fund of the United States, JSTOR, 2018.

[2] Arduino A. China’s One Belt One Road: Has the European Union missed the train? S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2016.

[3] Ghiasy R. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Security implications and ways forward for the European Union. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2018.

[4] Geeraerts G. Europe and China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Growing Concerns, More Strategy. Egmont Institute, JSTOR, 2019.

[5] Findlay C, Tangkitvanich S. New dimensions of connectivity in the Asia-Pacific. (1st ed). ANU Press, 2021.

[6] Geng Z, He G. Digital financial inclusion and sustainable employment: Evidence from countries along the belt and road. Borsa Istanbul Review, 2021, 21(3): 307–316.

[7] Grieger G. One Belt, One Road (OBOR): China's Regional Integration Initiative. European Parliamentary Research Service, 2018.

[8] Garlick J. The impact of the Belt and Road Initiative on central and Eastern Europe: The transformative power of China? Asia Europe Journal, 2020, 18(3): 1-19.

[9] Van der P, Seaman J, Huotari M, et al. Europe and China’s new Silk Roads. ETNC Report, 2016.

[10] Casarini N. When all roads lead to Beijing: Assessing China’s New Silk Road and its implications for Europe. The International Spectator, 2016, 51(4): 95-108.

[11] Zeng J. Does Europe matter? The role of Europe in Chinese narratives of 'One Belt One Road' and 'New Type of Great Power Relations'. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2017, 55(5): 1162-1176.

[12] Zhou J, Hallding K, Han G. The Trouble with China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ strategy. The Diplomat, 2015.

Downloads

Published

05-12-2024

How to Cite

Ding, Y., Hui, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Analysis of the Adaptation of the Belt and Road Initiative in the European Union: A Perspective Based on Multilateral Cooperation, Sociocultural and Sustainable Development. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 43, 345-351. https://doi.org/10.54097/f12w8p49