Fusing multi-model climate risk assessment and insurance profitability prediction: a machine learning-based cross-country comparative analysis

Authors

  • Chenlin Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/zwpzb031

Keywords:

Climate Risk, Insurance Profitability, Machine Learning, LightGBM, XGBoost, Cross-Country Comparison, Entropy Weighting Method, Fuzzy Assessment.

Abstract

Climate change-induced increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events year after year pose a significant challenge to the profitability of the global insurance industry. Traditional risk assessment models have limitations in predicting insurance profitability due to the difficulty in coping with the nonlinearity and complexity of climate risk. To this end, this study proposes a multi-model fusion approach that combines fuzzy assessment models, entropy weighting, linear regression, and machine learning models (LightGBM & XGBoost) to assess the impact of climate risk on the profitability of the insurance industry. By analyzing cross-country empirical data from the U.S. and U.K. insurance markets, this study reveals the differences and challenges in coping with climate risk in different countries. The findings show that climate risk significantly affects the profitability of insurance companies and that machine learning models exhibit higher accuracy and reliability in risk prediction compared to traditional methods. This paper provides an empirical basis for insurers and policymakers to address the economic impacts of climate change and makes recommendations for optimizing insurance risk management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Berliner, B. Limits of insurability of risks: Theory and practice [M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2017.

[2] Botzen, W. J. W., Deschenes, O., & Sanders, M. The economic impacts of natural disasters: A review of models and empirical studies [J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2019, 13 (2): 167 - 188. DOI: 10.1093/reep/rez004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez004

[3] Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system [C]//Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2016: 785 - 794. DOI: 10.1145/2939672.2939785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

[4] Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction [M]. Springer, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5

[5] Henckaerts, L., Taylor, S., Di Mauro, C., & Marcellino, M. Climate change impacts on insurance: Forecasting weather-related claims with machine learning [J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2020, 90: 77 - 91. DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020. 04. 005.

[6] Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., & Liu, T. Y. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017, 30: 3146 - 3154.

[7] Stern, N. The economics of climate change[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 98 (2): 1 - 37. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98. 2. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.1

[8] Swiss Re Institute. Natural catastrophes in 2020 and 2021: A rise in insured losses[R]. Swiss Re, 2021.

[9] Pang, M., & Li, Z. A novel profit-based validity index approach for feature selection in credit risk prediction [J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024049

[10] Bisht, G., & Pal, A. K. A q-rung orthopair fuzzy decision-making framework considering experts trust relationships and psychological behavior: An application to green supplier selection [J]. Decision Science Letters, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2023.12.002

[11] Nordin, S. Z. S., Wah, Y. B., Haur, N. K., Hashim, A., Rambeli, N., & Abdul Jalil, N. Predicting automobile insurance fraud using classical and machine learning models [J]. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2024.

[12] Zheng, H., Peng, F., Tian, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, W. Insurance fraud detection based on XGBoost [J]. Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science, 2023.

[13] Poufinas, T., Gogas, P., Papadimitriou, T., & Zaganidis, E. Machine learning in forecasting motor insurance claims [J]. Risks, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4610457

[14] Li, Z., Niu, Y., Chen, X., & Huang, C. A financial risk control method based on XGBoost algorithm [J]. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2023.

[15] Qin, R. The construction of corporate financial management risk model based on XGBoost algorithm [J]. Journal of Mathematics, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2043369

[16] Lu, W. Research on a tourism development level evaluation algorithm based on a combination of entropy weight method and fuzzy evaluation [C]//Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3635175.3635199

Downloads

Published

24-12-2024

How to Cite

Xia, C. (2024). Fusing multi-model climate risk assessment and insurance profitability prediction: a machine learning-based cross-country comparative analysis. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 45, 693-701. https://doi.org/10.54097/zwpzb031