Research on Olympic Site Selection Based on Evaluation Model

Authors

  • Hongyang Li
  • Bao Liu
  • Xinglin Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v68i.11929

Keywords:

Olympic Site Selection Evaluation System, EWM-TOPSIS, Cluster Analysis, Euler Distance.

Abstract

In recent years, most countries and cities have suffered certain negative effects, and the motivation to host the Olympic Games has dropped significantly, and the number of countries declaring the Olympics has decreased. This paper gives two options for holding the Olympic Games as a way to help the ICMG committee solve the Olympic Games site selection problem.determining the permanent site for the Olympic Games, considering that the permanent site requires a certain level of prestige and economic support from the country, the paper decided to start with countries that have hosted the Summer and Winter Olympic Games, because these countries tend to have a better Olympic atmosphere and the old sites of Olympic stadiums can help ease the burden of the host country. In order to select the most suitable permanent site from the former host countries, the paper considered a number of indicators to describe the success of previous Olympic Games, such as economic level, human satisfaction, the level of prestige of the host country or city, etc., and subdivided the secondary indicators on the basis of the primary indicators, thus establishing the Olympic Site Evaluation System, which was adopted by the EWM-TOPSIS model to rate each host, and the most suitable permanent site for the Summer Olympics is London, UK, while the most suitable permanent site for the Winter Olympics is Lake Placid, USA, by Matlab software solution.Holding the Four Seasons Olympics. In this paper, firstly, according to the IOC’s classification criteria for the Games, the paper determined the major sports to be held in four seasons based on reasonable criteria, including 10 major sports in spring, 17 major sports in summer, 3 major sports in autumn and 7 major sports in winter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hong, E. (2018). Sustainable Olympics: A systematic review. Sustainability, 10(4), 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041197

Chalkley, B., & Essex, S. (2019). The decline in Olympic bids: What are the im- plications? Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 11(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2018.1496636

Preuss, H. (2017). Assessing the costs and benefits of hosting a mega-event: The case of the Olympic Games. European Journal of Tourism Research, 16, 94-106.

Brownell, S. (2016). Can the Olympic Games be saved? The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515617745

Scientific Platform Serving for Statistics Professional 2021. SPSSPRO. (Version 1.0.11)[On- line Application Software]. Retrieved from https://www.spsspro.com.

Shih H S, Shyur H J, Lee E S. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making[J]. Math- ematical & Computer Modelling, 2007, 45(7):801-813.

Jia Kaihua, Yu Yunxia, Fan Xiubo, Li Maoxuan, Wang Dong, Tang Cuicui, Ji Zhang. Com- prehensive evaluation of multi-energy complementary systems based on AHP-EWM com- prehensive the paperighting and TOPSIS method [J/OL]. China Electric Pothe paperr: 1-13 [2023-04-02] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3265.TM.20230330.1326.002.html

Luo Ziyuan, Tian Jian, Ding Strongluo, Wang Ning, Zeng Jian. Rain and flood disaster risk assessment in Xiamen based on entropy the paperighted TOPSIS and neural network composite method [J]. Disaster Science, 2022,37 (04): 184-192

Wang the paperi. Software project risk assessment based on entropy the paperight TOPSIS [J]. Project Management Technology, 2022,20 (02): 102-107

Fan Yanyan, Han Shiyu, Jiang Xu, Lv Yuying. Evaluation of Safety System Resilience during Operation of Plateau Railway Based on Combination the paperighting Euclidean Distance [J/OL]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering: 1-11 [2023-04-02]. DOI: 10.19713/j.cnki.43- 1423/u.T20221861

Downloads

Published

09-10-2023

How to Cite

Li, H., Liu, B., & Zhu, X. (2023). Research on Olympic Site Selection Based on Evaluation Model. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 68, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v68i.11929