A framework of credibility assessment for CFD software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v77i.14431Keywords:
Computational Fluid Dynamics, Software Computing, Aerodynamics.Abstract
This article presents a framework of credibility assessment for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software. In order to quantify the credibility of the computational results of CFD software, this work carried out the theoretical research on credibility assessment methodology, and built a framework which consists of two parts: indicator system and algorithm for quantitative assessment. The framework specified the general elements and processes of CFD software credibility assessment, proposed the principles for the design of assessment indicator system, and developed effective quantitative algorithm, which solved the key problems such as what to assessment and how to quantify the agreement between computational results and referenced data.
Downloads
References
AIAA, Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations, AIAA-G-077-1998.
C.J. Roy, Grid convergence error analysis for mixed order numerical schemes, AIAA Journal, 2003.
J.Q. Chen, Y.R. Zhang, Research on CFD verification and validation method based on the richardson interpolation method, Journal of Air Power Science, 2012, 30 (2): 176-183.
V.K. Maruli, C. Burg, Verification of 2D Navier-Stokes codes by the method of manufactured solutions, AIAA Paper 2002-3109, 2002.
Roache, J. Patrick, Code verification by the method of manufactured solutions, ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2002.
N.H. Wang, L.P. Zhang, Z. Zhao, etc, The non-structural second-order limited volume discrete format based on manufacturing solution, Journal of Mechanics, 2017, 49 (3): 627-637.
C.J. Roy, E.N. Tinoco. Summary of data from the Sixth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop: Case 1 Code Verification, AIAA Paper 2017-1206, 2017.
Y.T. Wang, Hiliftpw-1 ~ Hiliftpw-3 numerical simulation technology summary, Aviation Journal, 2018, 39 (7): 021997.
J.Q. Chen, The research progress of key technologies of national numerical windtunnel project, China Science: Science of Technology, 2020.
W. Zhao, J.T. Chen, W. Xiao, etc, Key technology research progress of verification and validation system of national numerical windtunnel, Journal of Air Power Science, 2020, 38 (6): 1165-1172.
Z.L. Peng, Q. Zhang, S.L. Yang, Comprehensive assessment theory and method study review, China Management Science, 2015, 23 (SI): 246-256.
Y. Liu, W. Chen, P. Arendt, etc, Toward a better understanding of model validation metrics, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2011, 133(7): 071005.
W.L. Oberkampf, G.T. Timothy, Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2002, 38: 209-272.
L. Zhao, Z.P. Yang, The validation measurement of the multi-response model based on the probability distribution distance, Control and decision-making, 2015, 30 (6): 1014-1020.
Y.J. Guo, Comprehensive assessment theory and method, Beijing: Science Press, 2002.
T.L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy processm, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
