Collaboration while driving: how sharing communication affects driving efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/2yaea374Keywords:
HMI, collaboration, driver, co-driver, driving efficiency, user interface.Abstract
Increasing of the current development of autonomous driving makes communication in the vehicle more frequent while allowing interaction between the driver and the co-driver to be not only limited to verbal communication but also reflected in the in-car HMI. However, in the current autonomous driving stage, drivers still need to focus in driving primarily, which leads to the driver is prone to driving distractions when interacting with passengers via HMI. This paper focuses on discovering the main factors that affect driving performance when drivers interact with co-driver sharing HMI information. In order to figure out how factors related to driving effects, we conducted two different tests with comparable designs from both objective and subjective ways. We recorded and calculated their driving behaviors and satisfaction levels, and provide some suggestions for creating an interaction principle in the HMI collaboration system.
Downloads
References
B. Güzin Sen, & Sener, “Design for luxury front-seat passenger infotainment systems with experience prototyping through vr,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (3), 2020.
N. Perterer, “Co-Navigator: an advanced navigation system for front-seat passengers,” International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces & Interactive Vehicular Applications, ACM, 2015.
V. Antrobus, G. Burnett, & L. Skrypchuk, "Turn Left at the Fairham Pub" Using Navigational Guidance to Reconnect Drivers with Their Environment. International Conference, ACM, 2015
S. Trösterer, M. Wuchse, C Döttlinger, A. Meschtscherjakov, & M. Tscheligi, “Light my way: visualizing shared gaze in the car,” ACM, 2015
O. Inbar, & N. Tractinsky, “Make a trip an experience: Sharing in-car information with passengers,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, Extended Abstracts Volume, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7-12, 2011. ACM, 2011.
D. Wilfinger, A. Meschtscherjakov, M. Murer, S. Osswald, & M. Tscheligi, “Are we there yet? a probing study to inform design for the rear seat of family cars,” International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
N. Perterer, “Safety through Collaboration: A New Challenge for Automotive Design,” the 19th ACM Conference, ACM, 2011.
C. Jing, J. Zhi, “Impact of shared tasks on vehicle safety and software usability,” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011.
J. L. Harbluk, P. C. Burns, M. Lochner, & P. L. Trbovich, “Using the Lane-Change Test (LCT) to Assess Distraction: Tests of Visual-Manual and Speech-Based Operation of Navigation System Interfaces,” Driving Assessment: International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, 2007.
M. Zobl, R. Nieschulz, M. Geiger, M. K. Lang, & G. Rigoll, “Gesture components for natural interaction with in-car devices,” DBLP, 2004.
Y. Liang, W. J. Horrey, & J. D. Hoffman, “Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction,” Human Factors, 57(2), 347, 2015.
S. Mattes, “The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation,” proceedings of the gfa, 2003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
