Comparison And Selection of Commonly Used Communication Protocols in Measurement and Control Instruments

Authors

  • Chenyu Zhuang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/em4syb59

Keywords:

Communication protocol; Performance; Application scenarios.

Abstract

In the contemporary landscape of economic globalization, the salience of the field of measurement and control has progressively intensified. Simultaneously, the utilization of serial bus technology within instrumentation has witnessed a considerable proliferation. Consequently, the judicious selection of an appropriate serial bus protocol has assumed paramount importance. It is incumbent upon practitioners to consider diverse factors, including the communication principles, performance attributes, and interfacing requirements, when making their choice, to ensure the efficacious and stable operation of their systems. This investigation employs a methodology that amalgamates a comprehensive literature review with experimental comparative analyses to ascertain the optimal suitability of Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (UART), Inter-Integrated Circuit (I2C), and Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) communication protocols across distinct application scenarios. Subsequent to a thorough comparative scrutiny, this study ultimately elucidates the respective merits and demerits of the UART, I2C, and SPI communication protocols, in tandem with their most judicious application contexts. This research endeavor serves to furnish engineers with valuable insights for the judicious selection of serial bus protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zou L, Wang Z, Hu J, et al. Communication-protocol-based analysis and synthesis of networked systems: Progress, prospects and challenges. International Journal of Systems Science, 2021, 52(14): 3013-3034.

Shi Wenqi, Gan Yujing, & Huang Guangming. Data acquisition IP core design based on NanEye 2D miniature image sensor. China Medical Equipment, 2019, 4(9): 55-58.

Ingaleshwara S S. Heterogeneous architecture for reversible watermarking system for medical images using Integer transform based Reverse Contrast Mapping[J]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 2021, 12(6): 308-315.

H. Kareem and D. Dunaev. The Working Principles of ESP32 and Analytical Comparison of using Low-Cost Microcontroller Modules in Embedded Systems Design. 2021 4th International Conference on Circuits, Systems and Simulation (ICCSS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2021: 130-135.

Dinesh Sheoran. Assistant Professor, Department of ECE, MSIT, C-4, Janakpuri, New Delhi, India. Universal asynchronous receiver transmitter. 2020: 36-38.

Wang Zhuangpeng, Xiao Bing, Liu Luoshi, & Ou Ben. Battery management system communication method based on I2C bus. Applied Science and Technology. 2020, 47(2): 48-52.

C. Liu, Q. Meng, T. Liao, X. Bao and C. Xu. A Flexible Hardware Architecture for Slave Device of I2C Bus. 2019 International Conference on Electronic Engineering and Informatics (EEI), Nanjing, China, 2019, pp. 309-313.

Peña E, Legaspi M G. Uart: A hardware communication protocol understanding universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter. Visit Analog, 2020, 54(4).

Sharma P, Kumar A, Kumar N. Analysis of UART Communication Protocol. 2022 International Conference on Edge Computing and Applications (ICECAA). IEEE, 2022: 323-328.

Trivedi D, Khade A, Jain K, et al. Spi to i2c protocol conversion using verilog. 2018 Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA). IEEE, 2018: 1-4.

Rekha S, Reshma B, Dilipkumar N P, et al. Logically Locked I2C Protocol for Improved Security. International Conference on Communication, Computing and Electronics Systems: Proceedings of ICCCES 2019. Springer Singapore, 2020: 707-716.

Downloads

Published

26-01-2024