Negative Ecological Impacts of Wind Power, Hydropower and Geothermal Energy

Authors

  • Qianwen Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/70vgzh53

Keywords:

Ecological Impacts, Wind Power, Hydropower, Geothermal Energy.

Abstract

With the rapid development of the global economy and increasing population, the demand for energy is growing. Clean energy technology has received a lot of attention in recent years, and it has solved the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil to a great extent, but it still has some negative effects on the environment. This paper obtains data on ecosystems from authoritative websites and published papers in various countries. Use these data to show the changes in the ecological environment before and after the development of clean energy. It has been found that wind power could reduce environmental pollution and water consumption. However, it causes visual interference, noise pollution and negative impacts on wildlife. Hydropower stations generally have comprehensive economic benefits such as flood control, navigation, aquaculture, landscaping and tourism. However, large reservoirs cause extensive inundation upstream of the dam and also affect plant-side aquatic ecosystems. The main environmental problems in the development of geothermal energy are the emission of toxic gases, the overuse of water resources, the negative impact of heavy metals on agriculture and the inefficient use of geothermal energy. In order to minimize the environmental problems associated with the development of various energy sources, it is hoped that the government will support the development of scientific and technological innovations through policies that regulate the development of energy sources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Rumman G, Khdair A I, Khdair S I. Current status and future investment potential in renewable energy in Jordan: An overview [J]. Heliyon, 2020, 6 (2).

Bashir M B A. Principal Parameters and Environmental Impacts that Affect the Performance of Wind Turbine: An Overview [J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/S13369 - 021 - 06357 - 1.

Cabrera-Cruz S A, Cervantes-Pasqualli J, Franquesa-Soler M, et al. Estimates of aerial vertebrate mortality at wind farms in a bird migration corridor and bat diversity hotspot [J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22 [2023-09-01]. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco. 2020.e00966.

Bernardino J. Bird Displacement by Wind Turbines: Assessing Current Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Studies [J]. Birds, 2021, 2.DOI:10.3390/birds2040034.

Sage E, Bouten W, Hoekstra B, et al. Orographic lift shapes flight routes of gulls in virtually flat landscapes [J]. Scientific reports, 2019, 9 (1): 9659.

Marques A T, Santos C D, Hanssen F, et al. Wind turbines cause functional habitat loss for migratory soaring birds [J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2020, 89 (1): 93 - 103.

Y. Teff-Seker, O. Berger-Tal, Y. Lehnardt, N. Teschner, Noise pollution from wind turbines and its effects on wildlife: A cross-national analysis of current policies and planning regulations, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 168, 2022, 112801, ISSN 1364 - 0321,

Xana lvarez Bermúdez, Valero E, Natalia de la Torre-Rodríguez, et al. Influence of Small Hydroelectric Power Stations on River Water Quality [J]. Water, 2020, 12 (2). DOI: 10.3390/w12020312.

Amalesh Dhar, M. Anne Naeth, P. Devereaux Jennings, and Mohamed Gamal El-Din. 2020. Geothermal energy resources: potential environmental impact and land reclamation. Environmental Reviews. 28 (4): 415 - 427.

Liang Xinyang, Ma Yao, Chen Lei, etc. Monitoring and analysis of the impact of the development and utilization of groundwater source heat pump system on the geological environment of engineering sites [J]. China Geological Survey, 2023, 10 (02): 94 - 102. DOI: 10. 19388/j. zgdzdc. 2023. 02. 12.

Downloads

Published

29-12-2023

How to Cite

Yang, Q. (2023). Negative Ecological Impacts of Wind Power, Hydropower and Geothermal Energy. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 80, 393-399. https://doi.org/10.54097/70vgzh53