Assessment of road safety performance based on Entropy-RSR model

Authors

  • Haoyuan Sun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kqjd9516

Keywords:

Road safety performance; Policymaking; Decision-making; Southeast Asia; Entropy; RSR.

Abstract

This paper develops a hybrid decision-making model, Entropy-RSR, for benchmarking road safety for Southeast Asian countries at the regional level. This model generates ranking and grouping of the countries, which provides policymakers and practitioners with a valuable tool for policymaking and decision-making in road safety management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhang, J., et al., Quantifying transport safety success at the regional level: A guide to policy and practice on investment for G20. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2023. 89: p. 101715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101715

World Health Organization, Regional strategy for road safety in South-East Asia. 2015.

Li, Y., et al., An integrated decision model with reliability to support transport safety system analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023. 239: p. 109540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109540

Chen, F., et al., Monitoring road safety development at regional level: A case study in the ASEAN region. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2017. 106: p. 437-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.016

WHO, Global status report on road safety 2009. 2009, World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland.

WHO, Global status report on road safety 2013. 2013, World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland.

WHO, Global status report on road safety 2015. 2015, World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland.

WHO, Global status report on road safety 2018. 2018, World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland.

World Bank Group, Data: Indicators. 2019.

Downloads

Published

13-03-2024

How to Cite

Sun, H. (2024). Assessment of road safety performance based on Entropy-RSR model. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 85, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.54097/kqjd9516