Analysis Of Different Types of Digital Audio Workstations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/6vvy8z41Keywords:
Digital audio workstation, personal budget, user experience, software compatibility.Abstract
With the development of technology, digital audio workstation (DAW) has become a must-have tool for modern music production, which allows music producers to edit, record, mix and add effects on the computer to create music works of various styles and qualities. This paper mainly introduces the definition, purpose, function, type and development of DAW, and how to choose the appropriate DAW according to individual needs. This article compares and analyzes three commonly used DAWs (Apple Logic Pro X, Cubase 12, Ableton Live Lite 11) from the aspects of personal budget, user experience, software operating system compatibility, long-term development, and whether live performances are needed. Their advantages, disadvantages and application range are pointed out. This paper also points out some limitations of DAW, (e.g., the requirements of hardware and software conditions, the difficulty of learning and mastering, the problems of music creation), and looks forward to the future development direction of DAW (the improvement of user experience and personalization, the utilization of cloud computing and artificial intelligence, and the integration of other fields and media). These results can help independent music producers to understand the basic situation and selection criteria of DAW, so as to better use DAW to create and express their own music ideas, and provide some reference and inspiration for further improvement and innovation of DAW.
Downloads
References
F. Fagnoni, and J. Morales, Digital Audio Workstations—The Infrastructure of Music Production (Music Online, New York, 2019).
P. Schaeffer, Studio d’Essai, présenté le, 5 (1948).
K. Stockhausen, Studie II (No. 3) (Universal Edition, London, 1956).
K. Stone, Stockhausen: Gesang der Jünglinge (Springer, Berlin, 1963).
J. Spaniol, The advent of electronic music and its impact on the career of Edgar Varese (MREC, London, 2007).
R. C. A. Mark II, RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer (ACM, Los Angele, 2010)
M. Schedel, Computer Music Journal, 32(4), 83-84 (2008),
R. Xu, Journal of Knowledge Information Technology and Systems, 9(5), 629-635 (2014).
J. Chadabe, Organised Sound, 9(1), 3-6 (2004).
C. Leider, Digital audio workstation (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004).
D. Nahmani, Logic Pro X 10.5-Apple Pro Training Series: Professional Music Production. (Peachpit Press, London, 2020).
D. Keeports, American Journal of Physics, 84(2), 86-86 (2016).
A. Mutavati and R. Muranda, African Musicology Online, 12(2), 56-64 (2023).
Y. I. Vivian, M. B. Arifin, I. Wahyuni and F. Y. Aprazaq, Pelita: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 5-12 (2023).
B. Smith, Music Teacher, 102(9), 62-63 (2023).
H. Duan, “Design and Realization of Composition System Based on Computer Information Technology,” In 2022 World Automation Congress (WAC) (2022) pp. 257-261.
A. Löfvenhamn, Ljuden du inte visste att du hörde: En studie kring keyboards inom svensk pop (Springer, London, 2022).
T. Hallas, Music Teacher, 101(2), 42-43 (2022).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







