Vaccine Hesitancy Prediction Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Authors

  • Yike Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/tw73y836

Keywords:

COVID-19, vaccine hesitancy, machine learning, deep learning.

Abstract

Modern medical technology has led to the development and implementation of vaccines for various infectious or malignant diseases, offering active acquired immunity to those who receive them. Despite extensive research and validation confirming vaccine safety, a segment of the population exhibits reluctance or refusal to get vaccinated, known as vaccine hesitancy. This hesitancy posed challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, hindering the attainment of herd immunity and contributing to a higher number of preventable deaths. It is imperative to accurately predict vaccine hesitancy by analyzing various population characteristics to distinguish between those with and without vaccine hesitancy. Subsequently, different communication strategies and incentives can be adopted. In this article, the author utilizes private data from a survey that includes demographic features about the participants, as well as their behaviors and beliefs about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination. To identify the most significant features, the author employed the feature importance method to eliminate features that were less influential and narrowed to the 17 most influential features. Machine learning techniques, including non-ensemble, ensemble, and neural networks, were employed to predict the data set and then calculate testing errors to compare each method on prediction accuracy. The authors concluded that neural networks have superior prediction accuracy and are mostly immune to overfitting. Although neural networks take a long time to train, the test error of less than 5.5% is significantly lower than the 6.5% average error of other methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Feehan, Jack, and Vasso Apostolopoulos. Is COVID-19 the worst pandemic? Maturitas 149, 2021, 56 - 58.

Sallam, Malik. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a concise systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates. Vaccines 9.2, 2021, 160.

Troiano, Gianmarco, and Alessandra Nardi. Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public health 194, 2021, 245 - 251.

Dror, Amiel A., et al. Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19. European journal of epidemiology 35, 2020, 775 - 779.

Garg, Arunim, and Vijay Mago. Role of machine learning in medical research: A survey. Computer science review 40, 2021, 100370.

Venkatesh, B., and J. Anuradha. A review of feature selection and its methods. Cybernetics and information technologies 19.1, 2019, 3 - 26.

Yuhang, Q. et al. Pose-guided matching based on deep learning for assessing quality of action on rehabilitation training. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 72, 2022, 103323.

Brause, Rüdiger W. Medical analysis and diagnosis by neural networks. Medical Data Analysis: Second International Symposium, ISMDA 2001 Madrid, Spain, October 8 – 9, 2001 Proceedings 2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001.

Raschka, Sebastian, and Vahid Mirjalili. Python machine learning: Machine learning and deep learning with Python, scikit-learn, and TensorFlow 2. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2019.

Sagi, Omer, and Lior Rokach. Ensemble learning: A survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8.4, 2018, e1249.

Tang, Cheng, Damien Garreau, and Ulrike von Luxburg. When do random forests fail? Advances in neural information processing systems 31, 2018.

Mijwel, Maad M. Artificial neural networks advantages and disadvantages. Retrieved from LinkedIn https//www. linkedin. com/pulse/artificial-neuralnet Work, 2018, 21.

Downloads

Published

13-03-2024

How to Cite

Zhao, Y. (2024). Vaccine Hesitancy Prediction Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 85, 1016-1024. https://doi.org/10.54097/tw73y836