Bayesian Optimization and Monte Carlo Simulation in Technology Sector Portfolio Allocation: A Comparative Analysis Using the Sharpe Ratio

Authors

  • Xinyu Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/xj8wkb98

Keywords:

Bayesian statistics; portfolio optimization; mean-variance optimization; conjugate prior; empirical data analysis.

Abstract

In the dynamic landscape of financial markets, the pivotal role of adept portfolio construction is more prominent than ever. By enabling investors to form combinations of assets, it not only aids in accomplishing specified investment objectives but also in diversifying potential risks. This process employs a systematic investment approach, fostering informed and judicious decision-making strategies in the financial domain. This research seeks to explore the application of Bayesian statistics in parameter estimation and portfolio optimization, particularly focusing on the volatility of the technology sector. Utilizing a conjugate prior to obtaining the posterior and employing Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) to calculate the expected return and covariance matrix, the study constructed portfolio weights based on Mean-Variance Optimization. This portfolio was then compared with weights derived from historical data analysis and a Monte Carlo simulation optimized by the Sharpe ratio. Remarkably, upon empirical testing on an out-of-sample dataset, the Bayesian approach exhibited a superior performance, showcasing robust resilience to potential risks. The study also acknowledges several limitations, suggesting directions for future research to refine the precision and reliability of portfolio optimization in the face of market volatility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Markowitz H. Mean-variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. Journal of Finance, 1952, 7: 77–91.

Becker H, et al. Improving Mean Variance Portfolio Construction With Machine Learning Stock Price Forecasts: A different approach to forecasting the sample mean for mean variance optimization. Erasmus School of Economics Bachelor Thesis Econometrics and Operations Research, 2020.

Keller W, Butler A and Kipnis I. Momentum and Markowitz: A Golden Combination. Social Science Research Network, 2015.

Lai T, Xing H, Chen Z. Mean–variance portfolio optimization when means and covariances are unknown. The Annals of Applied Statistics, Ann. Appl. Stat., 2021, 5(2): 798-823.

Winkler R, Barry C. A Bayesian Model for Portfolio Selection and Revision. The Journal of Finance, 1975, 30(1): 179–92.

Klein R, Bawa V. The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(3): 215-231.

Zellner A, Chetty K. Prediction and Decision Problems in Regression Models from the Bayesian Point of View, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1965, 60: 608-616.

Jorion P. Bayes-Stein Estimation for Portfolio Analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1986, 21(3): 279-292.

Pástor L. Portfolio selection and asset pricing models. Journal of Finane, 2000, 55(1): 179-223.

Bodnar, el al. Estimation of the global minimum variance portfolio in high dimensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 226(1): 371-390.

Kacperczyk M, Damien P, Walker S. A new class of Bayesian semi-parametric models with applications to option pricing, Quantitative Finance, 2013, 13(6): 967-980.

Avramov D, Zhou, G. Bayesian Portfolio Analysis. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2010, 2: 25-47.

Bauder D, et al. Bayesian inference for the tangent portfolio. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 2018, 21(08).

Downloads

Published

29-03-2024

How to Cite

Hu, X. (2024). Bayesian Optimization and Monte Carlo Simulation in Technology Sector Portfolio Allocation: A Comparative Analysis Using the Sharpe Ratio. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 88, 300-310. https://doi.org/10.54097/xj8wkb98