Combining Kinematic Modeling and TOPSIS For Enhanced Submarine Rescue Missions: Path Prediction and Equipment Assessment

Authors

  • Siyu Yao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/b0dyyj56

Keywords:

Prediction Model, position control, multicriteria decision-making, underwater rescue.

Abstract

With the growing interest in exploring the unknown underwater world, underwater tourism has become an emerging trend, which also brings about new demands for tourism safety and underwater exploration technologies. In this context, this paper aims to investigate path prediction modeling for submarine failure scenarios with an example in the Ionian Sea. In this paper, a prediction model based on kinematics and dynamics equations is used and combined with a Gaussian Markov process to simulate the current velocity, while an uncertainty perturbation term is introduced to improve the model's realism. To ensure that the submarine can be found in the shortest possible time, this paper establishes the weights of the dimensional and indicator layers based on the analysis hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weighting method (EWM) and then calculates the scores of the required devices using the TOPSIS method. It was finally determined that the most suitable equipment is the magnetometer, followed by equipment such as a sonar system. This study provides a framework for improving search and rescue efficiency in submarine malfunction situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

VU M T, LE T H, THANH H, et al. Robust Position Control of an Over-actuated Underwater Vehicle under Model Uncertainties and Ocean Current Effects Using Dynamic Sliding Mode Surface and Optimal Allocation Control [J]. Sensors (Basel), 2021, 21(3).

LEAL J E. AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method [J]. MethodsX, 2020, 7: 100748.

ZHU Y, TIAN D, YAN F. Effectiveness of entropy weight method in decision-making [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1-5.

ÇELIKBILEK Y, TÜYSÜZ F. An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis [J]. Journal of Management Analytics, 2020, 7(2): 281-300.

GUTH P L, VAN NIEKERK A, GROHMANN C H, et al. Digital elevation models: terminology and definitions [J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(18): 3581.

MCFARLAND C J, WHITCOMB L L. Stable adaptive identification of fully coupled second‐order 6 degree‐of‐freedom nonlinear plant models for underwater vehicles: Theory and experimental evaluation [J]. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 2021, 35(5): 786-810.

ECHEANDIA S, WENSING P M. Numerical methods to compute the coriolis matrix and christoffel symbols for rigid-body systems [J]. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2021, 16(9): 091004.

BHATTI M M, MARIN M, ZEESHAN A, et al. Recent trends in computational fluid dynamics [J]. Frontiers in Physics, 2020, 8: 593111.

FOSSEN T I. Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

WERTHEIM E. The Naval Institute Guide to Combat Fleets of the World: Their Ships, Aircraft, and Systems [M]. Naval Institute Press, 2007.

JIANG Z, LIU Z, XU J, et al. An Integrated Energy System Evaluation Method Based on FAHP-EWM-TOPSIS; proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 4th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC), F, 2021 [C]. IEEE.

Downloads

Published

20-05-2024