Integrating Disaster Risks: A Comprehensive Catastrophe Risk Assessment Model and Its Empirical Validation

Authors

  • Xingkai Zhao
  • Wenrui Yang
  • Jiale Chu
  • Xinyi Shen
  • Xinru Huang
  • Haotian Tang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r1acgh46

Keywords:

Catastrophic events, Insurance, Catastrophe Risk Assessment Model, G2-EWM.

Abstract

The increasing frequency and severity of catastrophic events worldwide highlight the urgent need for the insurance sector to enhance risk assessment strategies. This study introduces a novel Catastrophe Risk Assessment Model that integrates three critical dimensions of risk: disaster-causing factors, disaster-bearing carriers, and disaster-pregnant environments. Utilizing the Grey System Theory and the Entropy Weight Method (G2-EWM), the model evaluates 11 indicators to assess the profitability for insurance companies (Q_profitability) and affordability for property owners (Q_affordability). An empirical analysis across ten randomly selected regions demonstrates the model's effectiveness, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8342 validating its accuracy. This research offers a comprehensive framework for understanding and managing catastrophe risk, providing valuable insights for insurance companies and policymakers to enhance risk management strategies and develop more tailored insurance products. By addressing the multi-dimensional nature of disasters, the model aims to contribute to the resilience of communities and economies against catastrophic events.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAKER R E, MAHMUD A S, MILLER I F, et al. Infectious disease in an era of global change[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2022,20(4): 193-205.

TABARI H. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020,10(1): 13768.

JIA-YING J, ZHOU L, SHEN W, et al. Performance evaluation and analysis of Chinese insurance companies under uncertain financial markets[J]. Heliyon, 2023,9(11): e21487.

SIMPSON N P, MACH K J, CONSTABLE A, et al. A framework for complex climate change risk assessment[J]. One Earth, 2021,4(4): 489-501.

ESANGBEDO M O, WEI J. Grey hybrid normalization with period based entropy weighting and relational analysis for cities rankings[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023,13(1): 13797.

AVILÉS IRAHOLA D, MORA-MOTTA A, BARBOSA PEREIRA A, et al. Integrating scientific and local knowledge to address environmental conflicts: the role of academia[J]. Human Ecology, 2022,50(5): 911-923.

DING Y, WANG P, LIU X, et al. Risk assessment of highway structures in natural disaster for the property insurance[J]. Natural Hazards, 2020,104(3): 2663-2685.

JIA T, ZHAO W, ZHU Z. Comprehensive evaluation method based on EWM and G2 weighting: An empirical study[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2019,35(8): 30-35.

CHEN T, S K, LOU P, et al. Analyst coverage, executive compensation and corporate risk‐taking: Evidence from property–casualty insurance firms[J]. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2023,90(4): 899-903.

GAO Y, DOU Y. Application of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the ALARP Principle[J]. Process Industry, 2024,01(01): 36-38.

Downloads

Published

20-05-2024