A study of tennis momentum based on a comprehensive evaluation model and a random forest model

Authors

  • Haocong Ding
  • Zhiwang Mao
  • Jingyan Cai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/perh1v89

Keywords:

Tennis Momentum, Comprehensive Evaluation Model, Random Forest Model.

Abstract

When the situation of a tennis match changes, the player's performance and momentum on the court are always a topic of concern for the audience. How to correctly and intuitively show the player's current momentum and predict the player's future momentum change is always a great challenge. In this paper, the momentum evaluation model based on comprehensive evaluation and the momentum shift prediction model based on random forest are established to address the above two problems, respectively. Among them, the player momentum evaluation model can not only accurately calculate the real-time momentum of both players, but also intuitively show which player has an advantage and the degree of advantage at each moment. The Momentum Shift Prediction Model can predict the momentum changes of future players based on current and past match data. These two models can not only help tennis coaches to better arrange the match strategy but also help tennis players to correctly analyze the court situation and make correct judgments, which has certain practical value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meier P, Flepp R, Rüdisser M, et al. Investigating the conditions for psychological momentum in the field: Evidence from men’s professional tennis[J]. Available at SSRN 3438123, 2019.

Mueller S, Ruiz M C, Chroni S A. Coaches’ perceptions of athletes’ psychobiosocial states: The case of three tennis coach-athlete dyads[J]. International Sport Coaching Journal, 2018, 5(2): 156-168.

Monaci M G, Veronesi F. Getting angry when playing tennis: Gender differences and impact on performance[J]. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 2019, 13(1): 116-133.

Cui Y, Liu H, Liu H, et al. Data-driven analysis of point-by-point performance for male tennis player in Grand Slams[J]. Motricidade, 2019, 15(1): 49-61.

Wilkens S. Sports prediction and betting models in the machine learning age: The case of tennis[J]. Journal of Sports Analytics, 2021, 7(2): 99-117.

Angelini G, Candila V, De Angelis L. Weighted Elo rating for tennis match predictions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2022, 297(1): 120-132.

Bunker1a R, Yeunga C C K, Susnjakb T, et al. Comparing Elo Ratings-with Machine Learning-based Methods for Tennis Match Result Prediction[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2023, 39(1): 1-15.

Bunker R, Yeung C, Susnjak T, et al. A comparative evaluation of Elo ratings-and machine learning-based methods for tennis match result prediction[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 2023: 17543371231212235.

Lowrance M. One More Shot: Predicting Wins in Women’s Professional Tennis[R]. Southern Utah University Working Paper Series, 2018.

Gollub J. Forecasting serve performance in professional tennis matches[J]. Journal of Sports Analytics, 2021, 7(4): 223-233.

Downloads

Published

20-05-2024