Emerging Technologies in In-Situ Printed Wearable Sensors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/wq0vsy69Keywords:
Wearable sensor; In situ bioprinting; Biocompatible materials; Object tracking.Abstract
Recent advancements in wearable sensors have significantly advanced the detection of physiological signals, both internally and externally to the body. The integration of innovative materials, such as flexible circuits, has allowed these sensors to achieve prolonged conformity with the monitored surfaces, thus enhancing the precision of signal gathering. In-situ bioprinting, a cutting-edge manufacturing technique, enables the direct fabrication of materials with diverse elastic properties onto specific surfaces. Sensors produced via in-situ bioprinting exhibit mechanical characteristics akin to human organs, improving their integration with the detection surface. Furthermore, the in-situ production process obviates the need for internal and external device transfer, substantially minimizing infection risks in clinical settings. The use of biocompatible inks also facilitates extended durations of wear, underscoring the profound potential of this technology. This article conducts a review of select studies to assess the current progress and technical hurdles in the domain of in-situ printed wearable sensors. It compiles the utilized printing materials, methodologies, and object tracking technologies, offering insights into the present and prospective advancements in in-situ printed wearable sensor technology.
Downloads
References
Kucukdeger E. and Johnson B. N., Closed-loop controlled conformal 3D printing on moving objects via tool-localized object position sensing, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2023, vol. 89, pp. 39-49.
Pugliese R. and Regondi S., Artificial Intelligence-Empowered 3D and 4D Printing Technologies toward Smarter Biomedical Materials and Approaches, Polymers, 2022, vol. 14, 2794.
O’Connell C. D. et al., Free-form co-axial bioprinting of a gelatin methacryloyl bio-ink by direct in situ photo-crosslinking during extrusion, Bioprinting, 2020, vol. 19, e00087.
Agostinacchio F., Mu X., Dirè S., Motta A., and Kaplan D. L., In Situ 3D Printing: Opportunities with Silk Inks, Trends in Biotechnology, 2021, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 719-730.
Johari N., Moroni L., and Samadikuchaksaraei A., Tuning the conformation and mechanical properties of silk fibroin hydrogels, Eur. Polym. J., 2020, vol. 134, 109842.
Zhang Y. S., Haghiashtiani G., Hübscher T., et al., 3D extrusion bioprinting, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers, 2021, vol. 1, p. 75.
Osman A. and Lu J., 3D printing of polymer composites to fabricate wearable sensors: A comprehensive review, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 2023, vol. 154, 100734.
O'Neill J. J., Johnson R. A., Dockter R. L. and Kowalewski T. M., 3D bioprinting directly onto moving human anatomy, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2017, pp. 934-940.
Zhu Z., Guo S.-Z., Hirdler T., Eide C., Fan X., Tolar J., and McAlpine M. C., 3D Printed Functional and Biological Materials on Moving Freeform Surfaces, Adv. Mater., 2018, vol. 30, 1707495.
Zhu Zhijie et al., 3D printed deformable sensors, Sci. Adv., 2020, vol. 6, eaba5575.
Guo S.-Z., Qiu K., Meng F., Park S. H., and McAlpine M. C., 3D Printed Stretchable Tactile Sensors, Adv. Mater., 2017, vol. 29, 1701218.
Park S. H., Su R., Jeong J., Guo S.-Z., Qiu K., Joung D., Meng F., and McAlpine M. C., 3D Printed Polymer Photodetectors, Adv. Mater., 2018, vol. 30, 1803980.
Williams N. X. et al., Silver nanowire inks for direct-write electronic tattoo applications, Nanoscale, 2019, vol. 11, 14294.
Singh M. et al., 3D printed conformal microfluidics for isolation and profiling of biomarkers from whole organs, Lab Chip, 2017, vol. 17, 2561.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







